Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a CS 1 course: An empirical study

SIGCSE'09 - Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 291-295

  Hundhausen, Christopher ^a   Agrawal, Anukrati ^a   Fairbrother, Dana ^b   Trevisan, Michael ^b  

^a School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Code inspection; CS education research; CS1; Pedagogical code review; Studio based learning and instruction

Indexed keywords

CODE INSPECTIONS; CODE REVIEW; COMPUTER SCIENCE COURSE; COMPUTING EDUCATION; CS EDUCATION RESEARCH; CS1; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; LEARNING METHODS; PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE; PROGRAMMING ASSIGNMENTS; QUALITY OF SOFTWARES; SENSE OF COMMUNITY; SOFTWARE DEFECTS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INSPECTION; RESEARCH; STUDENTS; STUDIOS;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 77955164851     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1508865.1508972     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Anewalt, K. Using peer review as a vehicle for communication skill development and active learning. J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21, 2, 2005, 148-155.
2. Gehringer, E.F. Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer science courses. In Proc. 32nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium, ACM Press, New York, 2001, 139-143.
3. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium, ACM Press, New York, 2005, 321-322.
4. Gilb, T. and Graham, D. Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1993.
5. Hundhausen, C.D., Narayanan, N.H. and Crosby, M.E. Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. In Proc. 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium, ACM Press, New York, 2008, 392-396.
6. Kern, V.M., Saraiva, L.M. and Pacheco, R.C.D.S. Peer review in education: Promoting collaboration, written expression, critical thinking, and professional responsibility. Education and Information Technologies, 8, 1, 2003, 37-46.
7. Trivedi, A., Kar, D.C. and Patterson-McNeill, H. Automatic assignment management and peer evaluation. J. Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18, 4, 2003, 30-37.
8. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium, ACM Press, New York, 2005, 455-459.
9. Wang, Y., Li, Y., Collins, M. and Liu, P. Process improvement of peer code review and behavior analysis of its participants. In Proc. 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium, ACM Press, New York, 2008, 107-111.
10. Wiegers, K. Improving quality with software inspections. Software Development, 3, 4, 1995, 55-64.
11. Williams, L. and Kessler, R.R. Experimenting with industry's "pair-programming" model in the computer science classroom. Computer Science Education, 11, 1, 2001, 7-20.