Remediation with cyclodextrin: Recovery of the remedial agent by membrane filtration

Remediation

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 21-36

  Boving, Thomas B ^a   Barnett, Stanley M ^b   Perez, Gustavo ^b   Blanford, William J ^c   McCray, John E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^b The University of Rhode Island   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955156067     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.20131     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bender, M. L., & Komiyama, M. (1978). Cyclodextrin chemistry. New York: Springer Verlag.
2. Blanford, W. J., Barackman, M., Boving, T. B., Klingel, E. J., Johnson, G. R., & Brusseau, M. L. (2001). Cyclodextrin-enhanced vertical flushing of a trichloroethene contaminated aquifer. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 21(1), 58–66.
3. Boving, T. B., & Brusseau, M. L. (2000). Solubilization and removal of residual trichloroethene from porous media: Comparison of several solubilization agents. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 42(1), 51–67.
4. Boving, T. B., & McCray, J. E. (2000). Cyclodextrin-enhanced remediation of organic and metal contaminants in porous media and ground water. Remediation, 10(2), 59–83.
5. Boving, T. B., Wang, X., & Brusseau, M. L. (1999). Cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization and removal of residual chlorinated solvents from porous media. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 764–770.
6. Boving, T. B., McCray, J. E., Blanford, W. J., & Brusseau, M. L. (2004). Cyclodextrin enhanced remediation at NAB Little Creek, Virginia Beach, VA: Cost and Performance Assessment. Report to Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, ESTCP (Department of Defense).
7. Chapelle, F. H. (2001). Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
8. Cherry, J. A., Feenstra, S., & Mackay, D. M. (1995). Concepts for the remediation of sites contaminated with dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs). In J. F. Pankow & J. A. Cherry (Eds.), Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in groundwater (pp. 475–506). Portland, OR: Waterloo Press.
9. Falta, R. W., Lee, C. M., Brame, S. E., Roeder, E., Coates, J. T., & Wright, C. (1999). Field test of high molecular weight alcohol flushing for subsurface NAPL remediation. Water Resources Research, 35, 2095–2108.
10. Gilham, R. W., & O’Hannesin, S. F. (1994). Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent iron. Ground Water, 32, 958–967.
11. Huling, S. G., & Pivetz, B. E. (2006). In-situ chemical oxidation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Engineering Issue. EPA/600/R-06/072.
12. Jawitz, J. W., Annable, M. D., Rao, P. S. C., & Rhue, R. D. (1998). Field implementation of a Winsor Type I surfactant/alcohol mixture for in-situ solubilization of complex NAPL as a single-phase microemulsion. Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 523–530.
13. Ladisch, M. (2001). Bioseparations engineering: Principles, practice and economics. New York: Wiley.
14. McCray, J. E., & Brusseau, M. L. (1999). Cyclodextrin-enhanced in situ flushing of multiple-component immiscible organic-liquid contamination at the field scale: Analysis of dissolution behavior. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 89–95.
15. Mulder, M. (1996). Basic principles of membrane technology (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. National Research Council (NRC). (1994). Alternatives for ground water cleanup. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. National Research Council (NRC). (1997). Innovation in ground water and soil cleanup, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
18. Sabatini, D. A., Robert, C., Knox, R. C., & Harwell, J. H. (1996). Surfactant-enhanced DNAPL remediation: Surfactant selection, hydraulic efficiency, and economic factors. Environmental Research Brief, EPA/600/S-96/002.
19. Sikdar, S., Grosse, D., & Rogut, I. (1998). Membrane technologies for remediating contaminated soils: A critical review. Journal of Membrane Science, 151(1), 75–85.
20. Szejtli, J. (1988). Cyclodextrin technology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Tick, G. R., Lourenso, F., Wood, A. L., & Brusseau, M. L. (2003). Pilot-scale demonstration of cyclodextrin as a solubility-enhancement agent for remediation of a tetrachloroethene-contaminated aquifer. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5829–5834.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (1993). Cleaning up the nation’s waste sites: Markets and technology trends. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
23. Voegtle, F. (1989). Supramolekulare chemie. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlag.
24. Wang, X., & Brusseau, M. L. (1993). Solubilization of some low-polarity organic compounds by hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 2821–2825.
25. Yang, J., Livingston, A. G., & Freitas Dos Santos, L. (2001). Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. Journal of Membrane Science, 190(1), 45–55.