Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II

Radiology

Volumn 256, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 379-386

  James, Jonathan J ^a   Gilbert, Fiona J ^a   Wallis, Matthew G ^a   Gillan, Maureen G C ^a   Astley, Susan M ^a   Boggis, Caroline R M ^a   Agbaje, Olorunsola F ^a   Brentnall, Adam R ^a   Duffy, Stephen W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED KINGDOM; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955148250     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091899     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lindfors KK, McGahan MC, Rosenquist CJ, Hurlock GS. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study. Radiology 2006;239(3):710-717. (Pubitemid 43830606)
2. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356(14):1399-1409.
3. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675-1684.
4. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005;237(2):444-449. (Pubitemid 41507878)
5. Taylor P, Potts HW. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(6):798-807.
6. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006;241(1):47-53.
7. Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Moss SM. Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading?: a review of the literature. Clin Radiol 2006;61(12):1023-1028.
8. Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Astley SM, et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10(4):R64.
9. Davidson AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
10. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(4):1083- 1088.
11. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(6):1483-1491. (Pubitemid 44788678)
12. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Lehman CD. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(6):1475-1482. (Pubitemid 44788677)
13. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146(4):661-663.
14. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson AR, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. Radiology 1996;199(3):811-817.
15. Evans AJ, Kutt E, Record C, Waller M, Bobrow L, Moss S. Radiological and pathological findings of interval cancers in a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40-41 years. Clin Radiol 2007;62(4):348-352.
16. Evans AJ, Kutt E, Record C, Waller M, Moss S. Radiological findings of screen-detected cancers in a multi-centre randomized, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years. Clin Radiol 2006;61(9):784-788. (Pubitemid 44207873)
17. Warren RM, Young JR, McLean L, et al. Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signs. Clin Radiol 2003;58(2):128-132.
18. Duncan KA, Needham G, Gilbert FJ, Deans HE. Incident round cancers: what lessons can we learn? Clin Radiol 1998;53(1):29-32.
19. Daly CA, Apthorp L, Field S. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier? Clin Radiol 1998;53(1):25-28. (Pubitemid 28043740)
20. Cornford EJ, Evans AJ, James JJ, Burrell HC, Pinder SE, Wilson AR. The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. Clin Radiol 2005;60(11):1182-1187.
21. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Zisman G, DeSimio MP, Rogers SK. A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(3):893-896. (Pubitemid 43899518)
22. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(2):439-444. (Pubitemid 46657247)
23. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001;219(1):192-202.
24. Ho WT, Lam PW. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 2003;58(2):133-136.
25. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220(3):781-786.
26. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001;11(12):2454-2459. (Pubitemid 33114897)
27. Astley SM, Gilbert FJ. Computer-aided detection in mammography. Clin Radiol 2004;59(5):390-399.
28. Taylor P, Given-Wilson R, Champness J, Potts HW, Johnston K. Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers. Clin Radiol 2004;59(12):1099-1105. (Pubitemid 40045623)
29. van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast 2008;17(1):85-90. (Pubitemid 351228791)