Second round cancers: How many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 25-28

  Daly, C A ^a   Apthorp, L ^a   Field, S ^a  

^a KENT AND CANTERBURY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0031973214     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80029-9     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Tabar L Fagerberg G Duffy SW Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer Radiologic Clinics of North American 30 1992 187 210
2. The Royal College of Radiologists. Guidelines for those involved in planning mammography in asymptomatic women. The Royal College of Radiologists (FCR/1/94).
3. Hollingsworth AB Taylor LD Rhodes DC Establishing a histological basis for false-negative mammograms American Journal of Surgery 166 1993 643 648
4. Tabar L Dean PB Teaching atlas of mammography 2nd ed. 1985 Thieme Inc New York
5. Armitage P Berry G Statistical methods in medical research 2nd ed. 1987 Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford
6. Bassett LW Manjikian V Gold RH Mammography and breast cancer screening Surgical Clinics of North America 70 1990 775 800
7. Ciatto S Rosselli Del Turco M Zappa M The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography British Journal of Cancer 71 1995 337 339
8. Jones RD McLean L Young JR Proportion of cancers detected at the first incident screen which were false negative at the prevalent screen The Breast 5 1996 339 343
9. van Dijck J Verbeek ALM Hendriks JHCL The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program Cancer 72 1993 1933 1938
10. Frankel SD Sickles EA Curpen BN Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance American Journal of Radiology 164 1995 1107 1109