A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects

Current Eye Research

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 703-714

  Jinabhai, Amit ^a   O'Donnell, Clare ^a   Radhakrishnan, Hema ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aberrations; Keratoconus; Refraction; Refractive error; Visual acuity

Indexed keywords

ABERROMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOCONUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL ACUITY; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ABERROMETRY; ADULT; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77955133880     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02713681003797921     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Liang J, Williams DR. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14:2873-2883.
2. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19:2329-2348.
3. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4:329-351.
4. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, et al. Metrics of optical quality of the eye. J Vis. 2004;4:1-15.
5. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004;4:322-328.
6. Guirao A, Williams DR. A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:36-42.
7. Cheng X, Thibos L, Bradley A. Estimating visual quality from wavefront aberration measurements. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S579-S584.
8. Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis. 2004;4:310-321.
9. Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Marcos S. Aberrometry: The past, present, and future of optometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2003; 80:1-2.
10. Thibos LN, Hong X. Clinical applications of the Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:817-825.
11. Cheng X, Himebaugh N, Kollbaum PS, et al. Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:587-595.
12. Thibos LN, Applegate RA.Assessment of optical quality. In: RR Krueger, RA Applegate, S MacRae (Eds.). Customized Corneal Ablation-The Quest for SuperVision. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack Inc., 2001; pp. 67-80.
13. Hong X, Thibos LN, Bradley A, et al. Comparison of monochromatic ocular aberrations measured with an objective cross-cylinder aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Opt Vis Sci. 2003;80:15-25.
14. Salmon TO, van de Pol C. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher- order repeatability, and instrument myopia. Optometry. 2005;76:461-472.
15. Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, et al. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Cat Ref Surg. 2003;29:2295-2301.
16. Navarro R. Objective refraction from aberrometry: theory. J Biomed Opt 2009; 14: 02402101-02402111.
17. Alio J, Shabayek M. Corneal higher order aberrations: A method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22: 539-545.
18. Lim L, Wei R, Tan D, et al. Evaluation of higher order ocular aberrations in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:825-828.
19. Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, et al. Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann-Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmol. 2002;109:1996-2003. (Pubitemid 35222551)
20. Gobbe M, Guillon M. Corneal wavefront aberration measurements to detect keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005;28:57-66.
21. Barbero S, Marcos S, Merayo-Lloves J, et al. Validation of the estimation of corneal aberrations from videokeratography in keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2002;18: 263-270.
22. Schwiegerling J, Greivenkamp JE. Keratoconus detection based on videokeratoscopic height data. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:721-728. (Pubitemid 27024189)
23. Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:381-389.
24. Pantanelli S, MacRae S, Jeong TM, et al. Characterizing the wave aberration in eyes with keratoconus or penetrating keratoplasty using a high-dynamic range wavefront sensor. Ophthalmol. 2007;114:2013-2021.
25. Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, et al. Effect of higher- order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:924-929.
26. Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, ODonnell C. Higher order aberrations in keratoconus: A review. Optom Pract. 2009;10:141-160.
27. Radhakrishnan H, Jinabhai A, ODonnell C. Dynamics of ocular aberrations in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 164-174.
28. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Gordon MO, et al. Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Cornea. 1996;15: 139-146. (Pubitemid 26061311)
29. Borisch IM. Clinical Refraction. Chicago: The Professional Press, Inc., 1970.
30. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: An application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74: 367-375.
31. Liang J, Grimm B, Golez S, et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994;11:1949-1957.
32. Miranda M, ODonnell C, Radhakrishnan H. Repeatability of corneal and ocular aberration measurements and changes in aberrations over one week. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92: 253-266.
33. Davies N, Diaz-Santana L, Lara-Saucedo D. Repeatability of ocular wavefront measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80: 142-150.
34. Hofer H, Artal P, Singer B, et al. Dynamics of the eyes wave aberration. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001;18: 497-506.
35. Cheng X, Himebaugh N, Kollbaum PS, et al. Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:351-360.
36. Efron S, Efron N, Morgan P. Repeatability and reliability of ocular aberration measurements in contact lens wear. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2008;31:81-88.
37. Navarro R, Losada MA. Aberrations and relative efficiency of light pencils in the living human eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:540-547.
38. Charman WN. Understanding ocular wavefront aberration: Part 2. The Optician. 2005;230:18-20.
39. Hong X, Thibos LN, Bradley A et al. Comparison of Monochromatic Ocular Aberrations Measured with an Objective Cross-Cylinder Aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann Aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 15-25.
40. Kollbaum PS, Bradley A.Correcting aberrations with contact lenses. Part 2. Cont Lens Spectr. 2007;Dec:31-35.
41. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4676-4681.
42. Carvalho LA. Accuracy of Zernike polynomials in characterizing optical aberrations and the corneal surface of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1915-1926.
43. Applegate RA, Ballentine C, Gross H, et al. Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:97-105.
44. Okamoto C, Okamoto F, Oshika T, et al. Higher-order wavefront aberration and letter-contrast sensitivity in keratoconus. Eye. 2008;22:1488-1492.