The relationship between interimplant distances and vascularization of the interimplant bone

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 822-829

  Traini, Tonino ^a   Novaes, Arthur B ^b   Piattelli, Adriano ^a   Papalexiou, Vula ^c   Muglia, Valdir A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone implant interaction; Morphometric analysis; Structural biology; Tissue physiology

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; DOG; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAINING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VASCULARIZATION; WOUND HEALING;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; FRACTALS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; STAINING AND LABELING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL FLAPS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 77955125027     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01926.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baish JW, Jain RK. Fractals and cancer. Cancer Research 2000, 60:3683-3688.
2. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. Journal of Dental Education 2003, 67:932-949.
3. Degidi M, Artese L, Rubini C, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Microvessel density (MVD) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) expression in sinus augmentation procedures using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-OssR): an immunohistochemical study at 3 and 6 months. Oral Diseases 2006, 12:469-475.
4. Degidi M, Artese L, Rubini C, Perrotti V, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Microvessel density (MVD) in sinus augmentation procedures using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-OssR) and autologous bone: 3 months results. Implant Dentistry 2007, 16:317-325.
5. Fernandes A, Wafae N, Yamashita HK. Angiographic study of the arterial supply to the palatine mucoperiosteum. Annals of Anatomy 2002, 184:41-44.
6. Kanczler JM, Oreffo RO. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. European Cells & Materials 2008, 15:100-114.
7. Kramer GA. A consideration of root proximity. The International journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 1987, 6:9-33.
8. Mair B, Fuerst G, Kubitsky P, Tangl S, Bergmeister H, Losert U, Watzek G, Gruber R. The anti-angiogenic substance TNP-470 impairs peri-implant bone formation: a pilot study in the rabbit metaphysic model. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007, 18:370-375.
9. Mancardi D, Varetto G, Bucci E, Maniero F, Guiot C. Fractal parameters and vascular networks: facts & artefacts. Theoretical Biology & Medical Modelling 2008, 5:1-8.
10. Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Mifune Y, Kawamoto A, Shoji T, Miwa M, Asahara T, Kurosaka M. Circulating endothelial/skeletal progenitor cells for bone regeneration and healing. Bone 2008, 43:434-439.
11. Novaes AB, Barros RRM, Muglia VA, Borges GJ. Influence of interimplant distance and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. The Journal of Oral Implantology 2009a, 35:18-27.
12. Novaes AB, Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Papalexiou V, Taba M. The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a Morse cone connection and a platform switch: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Journal of Periodontology 2006a, 77:1839-1849.
13. Novaes AB, Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Taba M. Bone remodeling adjacent to Morse cone connection implants with a platform switch. A fluorescence study in the dog mandible. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2009b, 24:257-266.
14. Novaes AB, Papalexiou V, Muglia V, Taba M. Influence of interimplant distance on gingival papilla formation and bone resorption: clinical-radiographic study in dogs. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2006b, 21:45-51.
15. Oliveira RR, Novaes AB, Papalexiou V, Muglia V, Taba M. Influence of interimplant distance on papilla formation and bone resorption: a clinical-radiographic study in dogs. The Journal of Oral Implantology 2006, 32:218-227.
16. Papalexiou V, Novaes AB, Ribeiro RF, Muglia V, Oliveira RR. Influence of the interimplant distance on crestal bone resorption and bone density: a histologic study in dogs. Journal of Periodontology 2006, 77:614-621.
17. Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist 1989, 59:247-256.
18. Roncalli JG, Tongers J, Renault MA, Losordo DW. Epithelial progenitor cells in regenerative medicine and cancer: a decade of research. Trends in Biotechnology 2008, 26:276-283.
19. Sandau K, Kurz H. Measuring fractal dimension and complexity - an alternative approach with an application. Journal of Microscopy 1997, 186:164-176.
20. Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Thams U, San Roman F, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Interimplant distance and crestal bone resorption: a histologic study in the canine model. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 2004, 6:150-156.
21. Sunagawa T, Bishop AT, Muramatsu K. Role of conventional and vascularized bone grafts in scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis: a canine experimental study. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2000, 25:849-859.
22. Traini T, Novaes AB, Papalexiou V, Piattelli A. Influence of interimplant distance on bone microstructure: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 2008, 10:1-10.
23. Yamada Y, Tamura T, Hariu K. Angiogenesis in newly augmented bone observed in rabbit calvarium using a titanium cap. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2008, 19:1003-1009.