Search behaviors in different task types

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 69-78

  Liu, Jingjing ^a   Cole, Michael J ^a   Liu, Chang ^a   Bierig, Ralf ^a   Gwizdka, Jacek ^a   Belkin, Nicholas J ^a   Zhang, Jun ^a   Zhang, Xiangmin ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Information retrieval; Personalization; Task type; User behavior

Indexed keywords

DECISION TIME; EYE FIXATIONS; EYE TRACKING; INFORMATION NEED; JOURNALISM STUDENTS; PERSONALIZATIONS; SEARCH BEHAVIOR; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TASK LEVELS; TASK TYPE; USER BEHAVIORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 77955112126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1816123.1816134     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Beymer, D., & Russell, D. M. (2005) WebGazeAnalyzer: A system for capturing and analyzing web reading behavior using eye gaze, CHI '05, 1913-1916.
2. nd Workshop on Contextual Information Access, Seeking and Retrieval Evaluation, Milton Keynes, UK, March 28, 2010.
3. Borlund, P. (2003). The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8(3), paper no. 152. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html
4. Byström, K. (2002). Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(7), 581-591.
5. Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191-213.
6. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press.
7. Granka, L. A., Joachims, T., & Gay, G. (2004). Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search. In SIGIR '04, 478-479.
8. Guan Z. & Cutrell, E. (2007). An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. In CHI '07, 417-420.
9. Gwizdka, J., Spence, I. (2006). What Can Searching Behavior Tell Us About the Difficulty of Information Tasks? A Study of Web Navigation. Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T), vol. 43. Austin, Texas, USA.
10. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 498-504.
11. Kellar, M., Watters, C., & Shepherd, M. (2007). A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & technology, 58(7), 999-1018.
12. Kelly, D., & Belkin, N.J. (2004). Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. SIGIR '04, 377-384.
13. Kim, J. (2006). Task as a predictable indicator of information seeking behavior on the Web. Unpublished dissertation, Rutgers University.
14. Li, Y. (2008). Relationships among work tasks, search tasks, and interactive information searching behavior. Unpublished dissertation. Rutgers University.
15. Li, Y. (2009) Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 275-291.
16. Liversedge, S. P., & Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 6-14.
17. Lorigo, L., Haridasan, M., Brynjardottir, H., Xia, L., Joachims, T., Gay, G., Granka, L., Pellacini, F., & Pan, B. (2008). Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & technology, 59(7), 1041-1052.
18. Lorigo, L., Pan, B., Joachims, T., Granka, L. & Gay, G, (2006). The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing & Management, 42(4):1123-1132, 2006.
19. Marchionini, G. (1989). Information-seeking strategies of novices using a full-text electronic encyclopedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(1), 54-66.
20. Morita, M., & Shinoda, Y. (1994). Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. In SIGIR '94, 272-281.
21. Qiu, L. (1993). Analytical searching vs. browsing in hypertext information retrieval systems. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 18(4), 1-13.
22. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
23. Rayner, K., Li, X., Williams, C.C, Cave, K. R., & Well, A.D. (2007) Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 47(21), 2714-2726.
24. Rayner, K., Smith, T.J., Malcom, G.L., & Henderson, J.M. (2009) Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception. Psychological Science 20(1):6-10.
25. Reichle, E., Pollatsek, A, & Rayner, K. (2006) E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading, Cognitive Systems Research 7(1), 4-22, 2006.
26. Sherman, C. (2005). A new F-word for Google search results. Search Engine Watch.
27. Starr, M.S., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 156-163.
28. Terai, H., Saito, H., Egusa, Y., Takaku, M., Miwa, M., & Kando, N. (2008). Differences between informational and transactional tasks in information seeking on the Web, in Proceedings of IIiX 2008.
29. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
30. Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing and Management 35(6):819-837.
31. White, R., & Kelly, D. (2006). A study of the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In CIKM '06, 297-306.
32. White, R.W., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J.M. (2005). A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. In SIGIR '05, 35-42.