Simulated MR magnetic field induces steady-state changes in brain dynamics: Implications for interpretation of functional MR studies

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 349-357

  Marino, Andrew A ^a   Carrubba, Simona ^a   Frilot II, Clifton ^b   Chesson Jr , Andrew L ^a   Gonzalez Toledo, Eduardo ^a  

^a Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain electrical activity; Electric fields; Limitation on fMRI; Magnetic fields; Nonlinear analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOELECTRIC PHENOMENA; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

BASELINE LEVELS; BRAIN ACTIVITY; BRAIN CONNECTIVITY; BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY; LIMITATION ON FMRI; LINEAR ANALYSIS; LINEAR TECHNIQUES; RECURRENCE ANALYSIS;

BRAIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHANTOM; SCALP; SHAM PROCEDURE; SIMULATION;

EID: 77955105637     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22435     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gazzaniga MS. The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000, 1276 pp.
2. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, Ellermann JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:5951-5955.
3. Brass M, Haggard P. The what, when, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist 2008;14:319-325. (Pubitemid 352010066)
4. Stippich C, Rapps N, Dreyhaupt J, Durst A, Kress B, Nennig E, Tronnier VM, Sartor K. Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:828-836. (Pubitemid 46799438)
5. Amaro E Jr, Barker GJ. Study design in fMRI: basic principles. Brain Cogn 2006;60:220-232.
6. Friston KJ. The labile brain, I: neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000;355:215-236.
7. Keevil SF, Gedroyc W, Gowland P, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Ludman CN, McLeish K, McRobbie DW, Razavi RS, Young IR. Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI. Br J Radiol 2005;78:973-975. (Pubitemid 41684023)
8. Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M. Feynman lectures on physics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1965.
9. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL Jr, Marino AA. Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense. Neuroscience 2007;144:356-367. (Pubitemid 44839044)
10. Carrubba S, Frilot IIC, Chesson AL Jr, Marino AA. Method for detection of changes in the EEG induced by the presence of sensory stimuli. J Neurosci Methods 2008;173:41-46.
11. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson A, Marino A. Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2006;157:39-47.
12. Klem GH. Artifacts. In: Ebersole JS, Pedley TA, editors. Current practice of clinical electroencephalography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p 271-287.
13. Krakow K, Allen PJ, Lemieux L, Symms MR, Fish DR. Methodology: EEG-correlated fMRI. In: Henry TR, Duncan JS, Berkovic SF, editors. Functional imaging in the epilepsies. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p 187-201.
14. Adey WR. Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Physiol Rev 1981;61:435-514.
15. Basar E. Toward a physical approach to integrative physiology, I: brain dynamics and physical causality. Am J Physiol 1983;245:R510-R533.
16. Katschalsky AK, Rowland W, Blumenthal R. Dynamic patterns of brain cell assemblies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1974.
17. Lopes da Silva F. Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;79:81-93.
18. Skarda CA, Freeman WJ. How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world. Behav Brain Sci 1987;10:161-173.
19. Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence: dynamical systems and turbulence. Berlin: Springer; 1981.
20. Rapp PE. A guide to dynamical analysis. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 1994;29:311-327.
21. Eckmann J-P, Kamphorst SO, Ruelle D. Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhysics Lett 1987;4:973-979.
22. Zbilut JP, Webber CL Jr. Recurrence quantification analysis. In: Akay M, editor. Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. p 2979-2986.
23. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL Jr, Marino AA. Nonlinear EEG activation by low-strength low-frequency magnetic fields. Neurosci Lett 2007;417:212-216. (Pubitemid 46551361)
24. Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL Jr, Webber CL Jr, Zbilut JP, Marino AA. Magnetosensory evoked potentials: consistent nonlinear phenomena. Neurosci Res 2008;60:95-105.
25. Carrubba S, Marino AA. The effects of low-frequency environmental- strength electromagnetic fields on brain electrical activity: a critical review of the literature. Electromagn Biol Med 2008;27:83-101. (Pubitemid 351913221)
26. Fitzek C, Haueisen J, Huonker R, Reichenbach JR, Pflieiderer SOR, Mentzel H-J, Sauner D, Brandl U, Kaiser WA. Effect of routine MR imaging of the brain at 1.5 T on subsequent magnetoencephalography: results in nine volunteers. Radiology 2004;230:715-719.
27. Frackowiak RSJ, Ashburner JT, Penny WD, Zeki S. Volterra kernels and effective connectivity. In: Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Price CJ, editors. Human brain function, second edition. San Diego, CA: Acdemic Press; 2004, p 1049-1062.
28. Onton J, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Makeig S. Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006;30:808-822. (Pubitemid 44292287)
29. Jin SH, Jeong J, Jeong DG, Kim DJ, Kim SY. Nonlinear dynamics of the EEG separated by independent component analysis after sound and light stimulation. Biol Cybern 2002;86:395-401. (Pubitemid 135689580)
30. Frilot IIC, Carrubba S, Marino AA. Magnetosensory function in rats: localization using positron emission tomography. Synapse 2009;63:421-428.
31. Marino AA, Nilsen E, Frilot C. Localization of electroreceptive function in rabbits. Physiol Behav 2003;79:803-810.
32. Marino AA, Carrubba S, Frilot C, Chesson AL Jr. Evidence that transduction of electromagnetic field is mediated by a force receptor. Neurosci Lett 2009;452:119-123.
33. Plewnia C, Rilk AJ, Soekadar SR, Arfeller C, Huber HS, Sauseng P, Hummel F, Gerloff C. Enhancement of long-range EEG coherence by synchronous bifocal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2008;27:1577-1583.
34. Yoo W-K, You SH, Ko M-H, Kim ST, Park C, Park J-W, Ohn SH, Hallett M, Kim Y-H. High frequency rTMS modulation of the sensorimotor networks: behavioral changes and fMRI correlates. Neuroimage 2008;39:1886-1895.
35. Sonnier H, Kolomytkin OV, Marino A. Action potentials from neuroblastoma cells in magnetic fields. Neurosci Lett 2003;337:163-166. (Pubitemid 36106582)
36. Lazar NA. Statistical issues in fMRI data analysis. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet J, Tsiatis A, Wong W, editors. New York: Springer; 2008.
37. Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008;453:869-878.
38. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press; 1980.