Atypical perceptual narrowing in prematurely born infants is associated with compromised language acquisition at 2 years of age

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Jansson Verkasalo, Eira ^a,b   Ruusuvirta, Timo ^c,d   Huotilainen, Minna ^c,e   Alku, Paavo ^f   Kushnerenko, Elena ^g   Suominen, Kalervo ^b   Rytky, Seppo ^b   Luotonen, Mirja ^b   Kaukola, Tuula ^b   Tolonen, Uolevi ^b   Hallman, Mikko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^f AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^g Institute for Research in Child Development   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHONEME; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEARING; INFANT; NEWBORN; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH;

EID: 77955082305     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-88     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Benasich A, Tallal P. Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behav Brain Res 2002, 136:31-49. 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00098-0, 12385788.
2. Kuhl P, Rivera-Gaziola M. Neural substrates of language acquisition. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008, 31:511-534. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094321, 18558865.
3. Jusczyk P. How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends Cogn Sci 1999, 3:323-328. 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01363-7, 10461194.
4. Jusczyk P, Hohne E. Infants'memory for spoken words. Science 1997, 277:1984-1986. 10.1126/science.277.5334.1984, 9302291.
5. Swingley D, Aslin R. Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 2000, 76:147-166. 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00081-0, 10856741.
6. Huotilainen M. Magnetoencephalography of the newborn brain. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006, 11:11437-11443.
7. Kushnerenko E, Winkler I, Horváth J, Näätänen R, Pavlov I, Fellman V, Huotilainen M. Processing acoustic change and novelty in newborn infants. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 26:265-274. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05628.x, 17573923.
8. Sambeth A, Pakarinen S, Ruohio K, Fellman V, van Zuijen TL, Huotilainen M. Change detection in newborns using a multiple deviant paradigm: a study using magnetoencephalography. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:530-538. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.12.033, 19211303.
9. Lewkowicz DJ, Ghazanfar AA. The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 25:6771-6774.
10. Cheour M, Čeponienė R, Lehtokoski A, Luuk A, Allik J, Alho K, Näätänen R. Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neurosci 1998, 1:351-353. 10.1038/1561, 10196522.
11. Werker J. Becoming a native listener. Infant development. The essential readings 2000, 149-162. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Muir D, Slater A.
12. Kuhl PK, Conboy BT, Coffey-Corina S, Padden D, Rivera-Gaxiola M, Nelson T. Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Phil Trans R Soc B 2008, 363:979-1000. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2154, 2606791, 17846016.
13. Kuhl P. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5:831-843. 10.1038/nrn1533, 15496861.
14. Kuhl PK, Stevens E, Hayashi A, Deguchi T, Kiritani S, Iverson P. Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Dev Sci 2006, 9:F13-21. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00468.x, 16472309.
15. Rivera-Gaxiola M, Silva-Pereyra J, Kuhl PK. Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11 month-old American infants. Dev Sci 2005, 8:162-172. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00403.x, 15720374.
16. Tsao FM, Liu HM, Kuhl P. Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study. Child Dev 2004, 75:1067-1084. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00726.x, 15260865.
17. Jansson-Verkasalo E, Valkama M, Vainionpää L, Pääkkö E, Ilkko E, Lehtihalmes M. Language development in very low birth weight preterm children: a follow-up study. Folia Phon Log 2004, 56:108-119.
18. Sansavini A, Guarini A, Alessandroni R, Faldella G, Giovanelli G, Salvioli G. Are early grammatical and phonological working memory abilities affected by preterm birth?. J Com Dis 2007, 40:239-256.
19. Foster-Cohen S, Edgin J, Champion P, Woodward L. Early delayed language development in very preterm infants: Evidence from the MacArthur-Bates CDI. J Child Lang 2007, 34:655-675. 10.1017/S0305000907008070, 17822143.
20. Woodward LJ, Moor S, Hood KM, Champion PR, Foster-Cohen S, Inder TE, Austin NC. Very preterm children show impairments across multiple neurodevelopmental domains by age 4 years. Arch Dis Child 2009, 94:F339-44.
21. Saigal S, Doyle L. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008, 19:261-269.
22. Wocadlo C, Rieger I. Phonology, rapid naming and academic achievement in very preterm children at eight years of age. Early Human Dev 2007, 83:367-377.
23. Bisiacchi PS, Mento G, Suppiej A. Cortical auditory processing in preterm newborns: an ERP study. Biol Psychol 2009, 82:176-85. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.07.005, 19631252.
24. Fellman V, Kushnerenko E, Mikkola K, Čeponienė R, Leipälä J, Näätänen R. Atypical auditory event-related potentials in preterm infants during the first year of life: a possible sign of cognitive dysfunction?. Pediatr Res 2004, 56:291-297. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000132750.97066.B9, 15181180.
25. Jansson-Verkasalo E, Čeponienė R, Valkama M, Vainionpää L, Laitakari K, Alku P, Suominen K, Näätänen R. Deficient speech-sound processing, as shown by the electrophysiologic brain mismatch negativity response, and naming ability in prematurely born children. Neurosci Lett 2003, 348:5-8. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00641-4, 12893412.
26. Peterson BS, Vohr B, Kane MJ, Whalen DH, Schneider KC, Katz KH, Zhang H, Duncan CC, Makuch R, Gore JC, Ment LR. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language processing and its cognitive correlates in prematurely born children. Pediatrics 2002, 110:1153-1162. 10.1542/peds.110.6.1153, 12456913.
27. Kushnerenko E, Teinonen T, Volein A, Csibra G. Electrophysiological evidence of illusory audiovisual speech percept in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 12:11442-11445.
28. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function 1992, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Kujala T, Karma K, Čeponienė R, Belitz S, Turkkila P, Tervaniemi M, Näätänen R. Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:10509-10514. 10.1073/pnas.181589198, 56991, 11517333.
30. Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 1994, 372:90-92. 10.1038/372090a0, 7969425.
31. Fenson L, Dale PS, Reznick JS, Bates E, Thal DJ, Pethick SJ. Variability in early communicative development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1994, 59:242.
32. Lyytinen P. Communicative and language development inventory 1999, Jyväskylä Niilo Mäki Institute.
33. Näätänen R, Pakarinen S, Rinne T, Takegata R. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:140-144. 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.04.001, 14706481.