EU involvement in TEN development: Network effects and European value added

Transport Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 299-311

  van Exel, Job ^a,b   Rienstra, Sytze ^a   Gommers, Michael ^a   Pearman, Alan ^c   Tsamboulas, Dimitrios ^d  

^a ECORYS Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Infrastructure assessment; Network effects; Trans European network; Value added

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 0036818825     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00016-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Badoe, D.A., Miller, E.J., 2000. Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their iimplications for modelling. Transportation Research Part D 5, 235-263.
2. Bristow, A.L., Nellthorp, J., 2000. Transport project appraisal in the European Union. Transport Policy 7, 51-60.
3. Brown, M., van Exel, N.J.A., 1998. A policy assessment model for major transport projects. Proceedings of 26th Annual AET European Transport Conference.
4. Button, K.J., 1993. Transport Economics. 2nd ed. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK.
5. Capello, R., 1994. Spatial Economic analysis of Telecommunications Network Externalities. Avebury, Aldershot, Hants.
6. Capineri, C., Rietveld, P., (Eds.), 1997. Networks in Transport and Telecommunications-A Policy Approach Ashgate, Aldershot.
7. CE, 1999. Efficient prices for transport [in Dutch]. Delft.
8. CPB, NEI, 2000. LeiGuide for Cost Benefit Analysis [in Dutch]. SDU, The Hague.
9. CPB, NEI, RIVM, 2001. Welfare effects of Maasvlakte 2. Supplementary Cost Benefit Analysis (in Dutch), The Hague.
10. Dodgson, J.S., 1973. External effects and secondary benefits in road investment appraisal. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1973, 169-185
11. ECIS, 1995. Lost and Found: The Community Component of the Economic Return on the Investment in PBKAL. European Centre for Infrastructure Studies, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
12. ECMT, 1995. European Transport Trends and Infrastructural Needs. Paris
13. EUNET, 1997. Socio-economic and spatial impacts of transport. Deliverable 10 EUNET project, (ST-96-SC037).
14. EUNET, 1998. Summary of EUNET project. Marcial Echenique and Partners Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
15. European Commission, 1995. Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport. Green Paper [COM(95). 691 final], Brussels.
16. European Commission, 1998a. Progress Report on the 14 Essen Transport Network Projects. Supplement to Transport Europe, June 1998.
17. European Commission, 1998b. Fair payment for use: a phased approach to a common transport infrastructure charging framework in the EU. COM (98) 466, Brussels.
18. European Commission, 2001. European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. COM (2001) 370, Brussels.
19. Fan, W., Treyz, F., Treyz, G., 2000. An evaluationary new economic geography model. Journal of Regional Science 40 (4), 671-695.
20. Fujii, S., Kitamura, R., 2000. Evaluation of trip-inducing effects of new freeways using a structural equations model system of commuters' time use and travel. Transport Research Part B 34, 339-354.
21. Grant-Muller, S.M., Nellthorp, L., Chen H. Pearman, A.D., Tsamboulas D. 1999. Decision analysis report and prototype, EUNET (socio-economic and spatial impacts of transport). Deliverable 16, European Commission Transport RTD Programme, Contract ST-96-SC037.
22. Grant-Muller, S.M., Mackie, P.J., Nellthorp, J., Pearman, A.D., 2001. Economic appraisal of European transport projects-the state of the art revisited. Transport Reviews 21 (2), 237-261.
23. Hayashi, Y., Morisugi, H., 2000. International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal. Transport Policy 7, 73-88.
24. Judge, E.J., 1996. Transport and locan and regional development: a review of current experience in the Yorkshire and Humberside Region of the United Kingdom. In: Chatterji, M., Domanski, R. (Eds.), Urban and Regional Management in Countries in Transition. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Pwn, Warsaw, pp. 115-139.
25. Kageson, P., 1992. External costs of air pollution: The case of European Transport, T and E 92/7. European Federation for Transport and the Environment, Brussels.
26. Knaap, T., Oosterhaven, J., 2001. The first spatial general equilibrium-model for the Nethlerlands: Results for Magnetic Levitation Train Schiphol-Groningen. Maandschrift Economie 65, 89-107.
27. Mackie, P., Preston, J., 1998. Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transport Policy 5, 1-7
28. Martínez F.J. 2000. Towards a land-use and transport interaction framework. In: Henscher, Button (Eds.), Handbook of Transport Modelling. Pergamon Press, New York.
29. Murphy, J.J., Delucchi, M.A., 1998. A review of the literature on the social cost of motor vehicle use in the United States. Journal of Transportation and Statistics.
30. NEI, 2001a. Integral CBA Connection Roosendal Antwerpen; Effects on Dutch and Belgian territory (in Dutch). Rotterdam.
31. NEI, 2001b. CBA Connection Roosendaal Antwerpen (in Dutch). Rotterdam.
32. NEI, 2001c. Unification of accounts and marginal costs for transport efficiency. UNITE, Deliverable 5, Rotterdam.
33. NEI, 2001d. Public private partnerships; introduction handbook, recommendations and conclusions. Deliverable D-4. Final Report of the PROFIT project (full text available from http://projects.nei.nl/).
34. Nellthorp, J., Mackie, P.J., Bristow, A.L., 1999. Measurement and evaluation of the impacts of transport initiatives. EUNET, (socio-economic and spatial impacts of transport), Deliverable 9, European Commission Transport RTD Programme, Contract ST-96-SC037.
35. Nijkamp, P., Blaas, E., 1994. Impact Assessment and Evaluation in Transportation Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
36. Pearman, A., 1998. EUNET, Presentation to the Interconnections Seminar: Towards Co-ordinated Action in Research and Policy. ICCR, Vienna.
37. Rienstra, S.A., 1998. Options and barriers for sustainable transport policies-a scenario approach. PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.
38. Rietveld, P., Nijkamp, P., 1993. Transport and regional development. In: Polak, Heertje (Eds.), European Transport Economics. Blackwell, Oxford.
39. Sichelschmidt, H. 1999. The EU Programme Trans-European networks-a critical assessment. Transport Policy 6, 169-181.
40. Small, K.A. Rosen, H.S. 1981. Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 49, 105-130.
41. Spiekerman, K. Wegener, M. 1998. Socio-economic and spatial impacts of Trans-European networks: the SASI project. In: Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., Winkelmans, W. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings from the Eighth World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium, 12-17 July. Pergamon, New York.
42. Tsamboulas, D., 1984. Multinational Transport Investments. EKISTICS 51 (395) special issue on Transportation and Movement.
43. van Exel N.J.A., van Ginkel J.C., Milner, S., Lehner, U., 1997. An extended methodology for the assessment of transport infrastructure projects-public acceptance and financial viability on one framework. Proceedings of 25th Annual AET European Transport Conference.
44. Vaubel, R., Willett, T.D., 1991. The Political Economy Of International Organisations: A Public Choice Approach. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
45. Vickerman, R., 1995. Location, accessibility and regional development: The appraisal of trans-European networks. Transport Policy 2 (4),