What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors a Delphi survey of clinicians

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Lambe, Paul ^a   Bristow, David ^a  

^a PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DELPHI STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TEMPERAMENT;

BEHAVIOR; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; EDUCATION; HUMANS; MEDICINE; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TEMPERAMENT;

EID: 77955067144     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.490603     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akins R, Tolson H, Cole B. 2005. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol [online]; 5:37. Available from: . Accessed 2009 May 5.
2. Albanese M, Snow M, Schochlak S, Hugget K, Farrell P. 2003. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 78:149-158.
3. Cohen J. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled agreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213-220.
4. Core Committee, Institute for International Medical Education. 2002. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 24(2):130-135.
5. Crewson P. 2005 May. Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists: Reader agreement studies. Am J Roentgenol 184:1391-1397.
6. GMC (General Medical Council) 1993, revised 2003. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: General Medical Council. . Accessed 2009 Apr 20. GMC (General Medical Council) 2006.
7. Good Medical Practice: Regulating Doctors Ensuring Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council. . Accessed 2009 Apr 20.
8. GMC (General Medical Council and Medical Schools Council) 2007. Medical Students: Professional Behaviour and Fitness to Practice.
9. GMC (General Medical Council) 2009. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GgGeneral MmMedical CcCouncil 2009, . (aAccessed 2009 April 2009).
10. Greatorex J, Dexter T. 2000. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. J Adv Nurs 32(4):1016-1024.
11. Greengross S. 1997. What patients want from their doctors. In: Allen I, Brown P, Hughes P, editors. Choosing tomorrow's doctors. London: London Policy Institute. pp 12-19.
12. Hardy D, O'Brien A, Gaskin C, O'Brien AJ, Morrison-Ngatai E, Skews G, Ryan T, McNulty N. 2004. Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand. J Adv Nurs 46(1):95-109.
13. Harris S, Owen C. 2007. Discerning quality: Using the multiple miniinterview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 41:234-241.
14. Holey E, Feeley J, Dixon J, Whittaker V. 2007. An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies, BMC Med Res Methodol [online]; 7:52. Available from: . Accessed 2009 May 5.
15. Hsu C. 2007. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. J Pract Assess Res Eval [online]; 12(10):4. . Accessed 2009 May 5.
16. Jamieson S. 2004. Likert scales: How to abuse them. Med Educ 38:1212-1218.
17. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. 2006. Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 53(2):205-212.
18. Landis J, Koch G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
19. MSC (Medical Schools Council) 2006. Guiding Principles for the Admission of Medical Students, Medical Schools Council Publications and Guidance. . Accessed 2009 Apr 20.
20. MSC (Medical Schools Council) 2008. Consensus Statement, the Role of the Doctor: Past, Present and Future, Medical Schools Council Publications and Guidance. . Accessed 2009 Apr 20.
21. O'Connell D, Dobson A. 1984. General observer-agreement measures on individual subjects and groups of subjects. Biometrics 40:973-983.
22. Parry J, Mathers J, Stevens A, Parsons A, Lilford R, Spurgeon P, Thomas H. 2006. Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: Review. BMJ 332:1005-1009.
23. Patterson F, Ferguson E. 2007. Selection for medical education and training. Edinburgh: Association for the Study of Medical Education.
24. Pell G. 2005. Use and misuse of Likert scales in letters to the editor. Med Educ 39: 970.
25. Powis D. 1998. How to do it: Select medical students. BMJ 317:1149-1150.
26. Reiter H, Eva K. 2005. Applied research: Reflecting the relative values of community, faculty, and students in the admissions tools of medical school. Teach Learn Med 17(1):4-8.
27. Tooke J. 2008. Aspiring to excellence: Final report of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. London: MMC Inquiry 2008.
28. Viera A, Garrett J. 2005. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005 37(5):360-363.
29. World Summit on Medical Education Communique. 1994. Med Educ 28(S1):1-3.