Aggregation of common-metric attributes in preference revelation and implications for willingness to pay

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 394-404

  Layton, David ^a   Hensher, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attribute addition; Information processing; Self stated intentions; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; TRANSPORTATION;

ATTRIBUTE ADDITION; DIFFERENT TREATMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS; NONLINEAR UTILITY FUNCTIONS; SELF-STATED INTENTIONS; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION; TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

TRAVEL TIME;

COMMUTING; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; PROBABILITY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL TIME; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES; SYDNEY [NEW SOUTH WALES];

EID: 77955057513     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Andersen, S., Harrison, G.W., Hole, A.R., Rutström, E., 2009. Non-linear mixed logit and the characterization of individual heterogeneity. Working Paper 09-02, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida.
2. Campbell D., Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R. Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 41:401-417.
3. Heuristics and Biases - The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
4. Hensher D.A. Measurement of the valuation of travel time savings'. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2001, 35:71-98.
5. Hensher D.A. Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2008, 42:297-322.
6. Hensher D.A., Layton D. Parameter Transfer of Common-Metric Attributes in Choice Analysis and Cognitive Rationalisation: Implications for Willingness to Pay. Transportation 2010, 37:473-490.
7. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M. Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: implications for willingness to pay. Transportation Research Part E 2009, 45:583-590.
8. Hensher D.A., Rose J., Greene W. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 700pp.
9. Kessel R., Goos P., Vandebroek M. Comparing algorithms and criteria for designing Bayesian conjoint choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 2006, 43:409-419.
10. Layton D.F. Alternative approaches for modeling concave willingness to pay functions in conjoint valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83:1314-1320.
11. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Coupey E., Johnson E.J. A constructive process view of decision making: multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica 1992, 80:107-141.
12. Rose J.M., Bliemer M.C.J. Stated preference experimental design strategies. Handbook in Transport Modelling 2007, Elsevier Science, Oxford. third ed. D.A. Hensher, K. Button (Eds.).
13. Rose J., Hensher D.A., Greene W. Recovering costs through price and service differentiation: accounting for exogenous information on attribute processing strategies in airline choice. Journal of Air Transport Management 2005, 11:400-407.
14. Rose J.M., Bliemer M.C., Hensher D.A., Collins A.T. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42:395-406.
15. Sándor Z., Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models'. Marketing Science 2002, 21:455-475.
16. Scarpa R., Willis K., Acutt M. Valuing externalities from water supply: status-quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2007, 50:449-466.
17. Scarpa R., Thiene M., Train K. Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 90:994-1010.
18. Scarpa R., Gilbride T., Campbell D., Hensher D.A. Modeling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation: does it matter?. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2009, 36:151-174.
19. Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 2000, 38:332-382.
20. Thomas M., Morwitz V. Heuristics in numerical cognition: implications for pricing. Handbook of Research in Pricing 2007, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
21. Train, K., Revelt, D., 2000. Customer-specific taste parameters and mixed logit. Working Paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/wp/train0999.pdf.
22. Train K., Weeks M. Discrete choice models in preference space and willing to-pay space. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, Springer, Dordrecht. R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.).