Planning for implementation of riparian buffers in the Feitsui reservoir watershed

Water Resources Management

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2339-2352

  Chang, Chia Ling ^a   Hsu, Tsung Hung ^b   Wang, Yunn Jiin ^b   Lin, Jen Yang ^b   Yu, Shaw L ^c  

^a FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Implementation strategy; Riparian buffer zone; Soil water conservation practices; Watershed model; WinVAST

Indexed keywords

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES; RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE; RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES; WATERSHED MODELS; WINVAST;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; EUTROPHICATION; LANDFORMS; MAINTENANCE; NUTRIENTS; PHOSPHORUS; POLLUTION CONTROL; QUALITY CONTROL; RESERVOIRS (WATER); WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; BUFFER ZONE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EUTROPHICATION; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RIPARIAN ZONE; SOIL CONSERVATION; WATER PLANNING; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHED;

FEITSUI RESERVOIR; TAIWAN;

EID: 77955057008     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-009-9554-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barling RD, Moore ID (1994) Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environ Manage 18(40): 543-558.
2. Chang CL, Lo SL, Yu SL (2006) Role of geographic information system (GIS) in watershed simulation by WinVAST Model. Environ Monit Assess 121(1-3): 287-299.
3. Chesapeake Bay Program (1995) Water quality function of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency for the Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis.
4. Guo QH, Ma KM, Yang L, He K (2009) Testing a dynamic complex hypothesis in the analysis of land use impact on lake water quality. Water Resour Manag (in press).
5. Hansen WJ, Orth KD, Robinson RK (1998) Cost effectiveness and incremental cost analyses: alternative to benefit-cost analysis for environmental remediation projects. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manag 2(1): 8-12.
6. Holvoet K, Gevaert V, Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Modelling the effectiveness of agricultural measures to reduce the amount of pesticides entering surface waters. Water Resour Manag 21(12): 2027-2035.
7. Hsieh CD, Yang WF (2007) Optimal nonpoint source pollution control strategies for a reservoir watershed in Taiwan. J Environ Manag 85: 908-917.
8. Jayakrishnan R, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Arnold JG (2005) Advances in the application of the SWAT Model for Water Resources Management. Hydrol Process 19(3): 749-762.
9. Leeds R, Brown LC, Sulc MR, VanLieshout L (1994) Vegetative filter strips: application, installation, and maintenance. Ohio State University Extension, Columbus, AEX-467.
10. McKague KJ, Cao YZ, Stephenson DE (1996) The CREAMS Model for evaluating the effectiveness of buffer strips in reducing sediment loads to wetlands. In: Mulamoottil G, Warner BG, McBean EA (eds) Wetlands environmental gradients, boundaries, and buffers. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 251-261.
11. Morschel J, Fox DM, Bruno J-F (2004) Limiting sediment deposition on roadways: topographic controls on vulnerable roads and cost analysis of planting grass buffer strips. Environ Sci Policy 7: 39-45.
12. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, Version 2000. USDA, Temple.
13. Norman AJ (1996) The use of buffer strips to protect wetlands in Southern Ontario. In: Mulamoottil G, Warner BG, McBean EA (eds) Wetlands environmental gradients, boundaries, and buffers. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 263-278.
14. Osborne LL, Kovacic DA (2006) Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshw Biol 29(2): 243-258.
15. Shoemaker L, Lahlou M, Doll A, Cazenas P (2002) Stormwater best management practices in an ultra-urban setting: selection and monitoring. Department of Transportation Publications Warehouse, Landover.
16. Tisdale TS, Kaighn RJ, Yu SL (1996) The Virginia storm (VAST) Model for Stormwater Management-User's Guide Version 6. 0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
17. U. S. EPA (2004) The use of best management practices (BMPs) in Urban Watersheds. EPA/600/R-04/184. September. Office of Research and Development, Washington.
18. WERF (2003) Post-project monitoring of BMPs/SUDS to determine performance and whole-life costs. IWA, London, Project Number: 01-CTS-21T.
19. Yu SL, Kaighn RJ (1992) VDOT manual of practice for planning stormwater management. Federal Highway Administration, FHWA/VA-R13, Virginia Department of Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville.
20. Yu SL, Stanford RL, Zhai YY (2003) Virginia Stormwater Model for Windows-user's manual Version 1. 0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville.