Role of geographic information system (GIS) in watershed simulation by winvast model

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 121, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 287-299

  Chang, Chia Ling ^a   Lo, Shang Lien ^a   Yu, Shaw L ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ArcGIS; Geographic information system; Non point source pollution; Runoff; WinVAST

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESERVOIRS (WATER); RUNOFF; USER INTERFACES;

NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; SIMULATION ERROR; TREE-VIEW STRUCTURE;

WATERSHEDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GIS; MODELING; RUNOFF; WATERSHED;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAND USE; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PREDICTION; TAIWAN; WATERSHED; EVALUATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIWAN;

FRESH WATER;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRESH WATER; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOFTWARE; TAIWAN; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 33750319192     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-9123-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bedient, P. B. and Huber, W. C.: 2002, Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., USA.
2. Chaubey, I., Haan, C. T., Salisbury, J. M. and Grunwald, S.: 1999, 'Quantifying model output uncertainty due to spatial variability of rainfall', Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35 (5), 1113-1123.
3. Donigian, A. S. and Huber, W. C.: 1991, Modeling of nonpoint source water qualityin urban and non-urban areas. Environmental Research Laboratory. Office of Research andDevelopment, U.S. EPA, Athens, G.A., USA.
4. Drechsler, M.: 1998, 'Sensitivity analysis of complex models', Biological Conservation 86, 401-412.
5. Faures, J. M., Goodrich, D. C., Woolhiser, D. A. and Sorooshian, S.: 1995, 'Impact of small-scale spatial variability on runoff modeling', Journal of Hydrology 173, 309-326.
6. Kaighn, R. J.: 1993, Improvement to Virginia Storm (VAST) Hydrologic Watershed Model including Detention Pond Pollution Routing. Department of Civil Engineering, Universityof Virginia, Charlottesville, V.A., USA.
7. Klepper, O.: 1997, 'Multivariate aspects of model uncertainty analysis: tools for sensitivity analysis and calibration', Ecological Modelling 101, 1-13.
8. Lung, W. S.: 2001, Water Quality Modeling For Wasteload Allocations andTMDLs. John Wiley and Sons.
9. McCoy, J. and Johnston, K.: 2001, Using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst. ESRI Press.
10. O'Neill, R. V. and Gardner, R. H.: 1979, 'Source of uncertainty in ecological models. Methodology in systems modeling and simulation', North Holland, Amsterdam, 447-463.
11. Tisdale, T. S., Kaighn, R. J. and Yu, S. L.: 1996, The Virginia storm (VAST)model for stormwater management - User's Guide version 6.0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, V.A., USA.
12. Vicente, L. L.: 1996, 'On the effect of uncertainty in spatial distribution of rainfall on catchment modeling', Catena 28, 107-119.
13. Wanielista, M., Kersten, R. and Eaglin, R.: 1997, Hydrology-Water Quantityand Quality Control. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 91-96.
14. Yu, S. L., Stanford, R. L. and Zhai, Y. Y.: 2003, Virginia stormwater model forwindows-User's Manual version 1.0. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, V.A., USA.