Natural history of spinopelvic alignment differs from symptomatic deformity of the spine

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 16, 2010, Pages

  Mendoza Lattes, Sergio ^a   Ries, Zachary ^a   Gao, Yubo ^a   Weinstein, Stuart L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

C7 plumbline; pelvic incidence; pelvic retroversion; sacral slope; sacral femoral distance; sagittal balance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACRUM; SPINE; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINOPELVIC ALIGNMENT; STANDING; SYMPTOM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THORACIC SPINE; X RAY FILM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; PELVIS; POSTURAL BALANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINE;

EID: 77955013612     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d35ca9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 1998;7:99-103.
2. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 2002;11:80-87
3. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, et al. The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 2006;31:E320-5.
4. Aspden RM, Rudman KE, Meakin JR. A mechanism for balancing the human body on the hips. J Biomech 2006;39:1757-1759
5. Kuklo T, Lenke LG, O'Brien MF, et al. AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual. Scoliosis Research Society; 2001.
6. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 2007;16:227-234
7. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E599-606.
8. Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:44-50.
9. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, et al. Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27:2026-2029
10. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 2006;15:415-422
11. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H, et al. The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 2002;11:119-125
12. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, et al. Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance: a correlation study. Spine 2004;29: 2049-2054
13. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:260-267
14. Meakin JR, Gregory JS, Smith FW, et al. Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model: reliability and precision of the method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:807-813
15. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, et al. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:1750-1767
16. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2808-2815
17. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, et al. The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:93-100.
18. Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Harrison DE, et al. Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine. Spine J 2005;5:297-309.
19. Richard MJ, Morris C, Deen BF, et al. Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:382-386
20. Brooks S, Suchey JM. Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: a comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. J Hum Evol 1990;5:227-238
21. Barrier P, Dedouit F, Braga J, et al. Age at death estimation using multislice computed tomography reconstructions of the posterior pelvis. J Forensic Sci 2009;54:773-778
22. Mangione P, Gomez D, Senegas J. Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J 1997;6:163-167
23. Descamps H, Commare-Nordmann M, Marty C, et al. Modification of pelvic angle during the human growth [in French]. Biom Hum Anthropol 1999; 17:59-63.
24. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1828-1833
25. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2024-2029