Correlating survey data and network data to understand performance in global virtual teams

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 6551-6560

  Gluesing, Julia C ^a   Riopelle, Kenneth R ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

email analysis; global virtual teams; performance assessment; semantic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954969346     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.065     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.
2. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of management, 29(6), 991.
3. Carley, K. M. (1995). Communication technologies and their effect on cultural homogeneity, consensus, and the diffusion of new ideas. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 547-571.
4. Cohen, S., & Mankin, D. (1999). Collaboration in the virtual organization. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 6, 105-120.
5. Cottrill, K. (1998). Knowledge management: networking for innovation. Chemical Week, 160(7), 39-41.
6. Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197-210.
7. Gibson, C., & Cohen, S. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Gluesing J. (1995). Fragile alliances: negotiating global teaming in a turbulent environment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
9. Gluesing, J., Alcordo, T., Baba, M., Britt, D., Wagner, K.H., McKether, W., Monplaisir, L., Ratner, H., & Riopelle, K. (2003). The development of global virtual teams. In C. Gibson, & S. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 353-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Gloor, P. (2006). Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Gloor, P., & S. Cooper. (2007). Coolhunting: chasing down the next big thing. New York: Amacom.
12. Gloor, P. A., Paasivaara, M., Schoder, D., & Willems, P. (2008). Finding collaborative innovation networks through correlating performance with social network structure. International Journal of Production Research, 46(5), 1357.
13. Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-508.
14. Monge, P. R., & N. S. Contractor. (2001). Emergence of Communication Networks. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 440-502).Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
15. Palmisano, S. J. (2006). The globally integrated enterprise. Foreign Affairs, 85(3), 127-136.
16. Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J., Alcordo, T., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., Monplaisir, L., Ratner, H. & Wagner, K. (2003). Context, task, and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In Gibson, C. & Cohen, S. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 239-264). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Rogers, E. M., & D. L. Kincaid. (1981). Communication networks: toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.