The use of Functional L-systems for scenario generation in serious games

Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games, PC Games 2010, Co-located with the 5th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Martin, Glenn A ^a   Hughes, Charles E ^a   Schatz, Sae ^a   Nicholson, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

FL systems; Scenario generation; Simulation; Training

Indexed keywords

L-SYSTEMS; SCENARIO GENERATION; SERIOUS GAMES; SIMULATION TRAINING; TRAINING COMMUNITIES; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 77954961461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1814256.1814262     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Forward Observer PC Simulator (FOPCSIM). Retrieved on April 23, 2010 from.
2. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. and Salas, E. 1998. Team performance and training in complex environments: recent findings from applied research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3): 83-87.
3. Ross, K. G., Phillips, J. K., Klein, G., and Cohn, J. (2005. Creating Expertise: A Framework to Guide Simulation-Based Training. In Proceedings of I/ITSEC, Orlando, FL: NTSA.
4. Salas, E., Rhodenizer, L., & Bowers, C. A. 2000. The design and delivery of crew resource management training: Exploiting available resources. Human Factors, 42(3): 490-511.
5. Bowers, C., Jentsch, F., Baker, D., Prince, C., and Salas, E. 1997. Rapidly reconfigurable event-set based line operational evaluation scenarios. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 4, 912-915.
6. Jentsch, F., Abbott, D., and Bowers, C. 1999. Do three easy tasks make one difficult one: studying the perceived difficulty of simulation scenarios. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (Columbus, Ohio).
7. Jentsch, F., Irvin, J., and Bowers, C. 1997. Differences in situation assessment between experts and prospective first officers. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (Columbus, Ohio). 1228-1232.
8. Hall, R. J. 1998. Explanation-based scenario generation for reactive system models. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Automated Software Engineering (Honolulu, HI).
9. Pfefferman, M. W. 1993. A Prototype Architecture for an Automated Scenario Generation System for Combat Simulations. Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology (Air University).
10. Erraguntla, M., Benjamin, P. C., and Mayer, R. J. 1994. An architecture of a knowledge-based simulation engine. In the Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference (San Diego, CA). Society for Computer Simulation International, 673-680.
11. KBSI . 2008. FEAST: Framework for Enabling Adaptive Scenario Generation for Training. Retrieved from http://www.kbsi.com/.
12. Benjamin, P. 2008. Knowledge based simulation: Methods and enabling technology. Tutorial presented at I/ITSEC 2008 (Orlando, FL).
13. Martin, G. A., Schatz, S., Hughes, C. E. and Nicholson, D. 2010. What is a Scenario? Operationalizing training scenarios for automatic generation. In Proceedings of Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (Miami, FL).
14. Tomizawa, H. and Gonzalez, A. 2007. Automated scenario generation system in a simulation. In Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (Orlando, FL).
15. Stiny, G. 1975. Pictorial and Formal Aspects of Shape and Shape Grammars. Birkhauser Verlag.
16. Prusinkiewicz, P. and Lindenmayer, A. 1990. The algorithmic beauty of plants. Springer-Verlag.
17. Marvie, J., Perret, J. and Bouatouch, K. 2005. The FL-system: A Functional L-system for procedural geometric modeling. The Visual Computer. 21, 5, 329-339.
18. Muller, P., Wonka, P., Haegler, S., Ulmer, A. and Van Gool, L. 2006. Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Transaction on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings). 25, 3, 614-623.