Assessing the role of stimulus probability on the Colavita visual dominance effect

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 418, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 266-271

  Koppen, Camille ^a   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audiovisual; Auditory; Colavita effect; Visual; Visual dominance

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME;

EID: 34247571306     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.03.032     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Colavita F.B. Human sensory dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 16 (1974) 409-412
2. Colavita F.B., and Weisberg D. A further investigation of visual dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 25 (1979) 345-347
3. Egeth H.E., and Sager L.C. On the locus of visual dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 22 (1977) 77-86
4. Fagot C., and Pashler H. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18 (1992) 1058-1079
5. Johnson T.L., and Shapiro K.L. Attention to auditory and peripheral visual stimuli: effects of arousal and predictability. Acta Psychol. 72 (1989) 233-245
6. Kaplan R.F., Verfaellie M., DeWitt L.D., and Caplan L.R. Effects of changes in stimulus contingency on visual extinction. Neurology 40 (1990) 1299-1301
7. Koppen C.M., and Spence C. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect. Neurosci. Lett. 417 (2007) 107-111
8. C.M. Koppen, C. Spence, Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp. Brain Res., in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3.
9. Macaluso E., Frith C., and Driver J. Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: Multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET. Cereb. Cortex 12 (2002) 357-368
10. Manly T., Robertson I.H., Galloway M., and Hawkins K. The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 661-670
11. Mattingley J.B., Driver J., Beschin N., and Robertson I. Attentional competition across modalities: extinction between vision and touch after right-hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 867-880
12. Maravita A., Husain M., Clarke K., and Driver J. Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39 (2001) 580-585
13. D.A. Norman, T. Shallice, Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. University of California, San Diego, Center for Human Information processing: CHIP Report 99 (1980).
14. Posner M.I., Nissen M.J., and Klein R.M. Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychol. Rev. 83 (1976) 157-171
15. Quinlan P. The 'late' locus of visual dominance. Abstracts Psychonom. Soc. 5 (2000) 64
16. Robertson I.H., Manly T., Andrade J., Baddeley B.T., and Yiend J. 'Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35 (1997) 747-758
17. Sarri M., Blankenburg F., and Driver J. Neural correlates of crossmodal visual-tactile extinction and of tactile awareness revealed by fMRI in a right-hemisphere stroke patient. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2398-2410
18. Shallice T. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. S. Sinnett, C. Spence, S. Soto-Faraco, Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Percept. Psychophys., in press.
20. Spence C., and Driver J. On measuring selective attention to a specific sensory modality. Percept. Psychophys. 59 (1997) 389-403
21. Spence C., Nicholls M.E.R., and Driver J. The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Percept. Psychophys. 63 (2001) 330-336