Trends in atlantic contribution to mixed-stock king mackerel landings in south florida inferred from otolith shape analysis

Marine and Coastal Fisheries

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 195-204

  Shepard, Katherine E ^a,c   Patterson III, William F ^a   DeVries, Douglas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

^b SOUTHEAST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954943510     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19425120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/C09-014.1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Begg, G. A., and R. W. Brown. 2000. Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:935-945.
2. Bergenius, M. A. J., G. A. Begg, and B. D. Mapstone. 2006. The use of otolith morphology to indicate the stock structure of common coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 104:498-511.
3. Broughton, R. E., L. B. Stewart, and J. R. Gold. 2002. Microsatellite variation suggests substantial gene flow between king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) in the western Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 54:305-316.
4. Campana, S. E., and J. M. Casselman. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1062-1083.
5. Campana, S. E., and J. D. Neilson. 1985. Microstructure of fish otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:1014-1032.
6. Cardinale, M., P. Doering-Arjes, M. Kastowsky, and H. Mosegaard. 2004. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:158-167.
7. Castonguay, M., P. Simard, and P. Gagnon. 1991. Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:296-302.
8. Clardy, T. R., W. F. Patterson, III, D. A. DeVries, and C. Palmer. 2008. Spatial and temporal variability in the relative contribution of king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) stocks to winter mixed fisheries of South Florida. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 106:152-160.
9. Collette, B. B., and C. E. Nauen. 1983. Scombrids of the world. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Fish Synopsis 125.
10. DeVries, D. A., C. B. Grimes, and M. H. Prager. 2002. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fisheries Research 57:51-61.
11. Fable, W. A., Jr., H. A. Brusher, L. Trent, and J. Finnegan, Jr. 1981. Possible temperature effects on charter boat catches of king mackerel and other coastal pelagic species in northwest Florida. Marine Fisheries Review 43:21-26.
12. Fable, W. A., Jr., L. Trent, G. W. Bane, and S. W. Ellsworth. 1987. Movements of king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, tagged in southeast Louisiana, 1983-1985. Marine Fisheries Review 49:98-101.
13. Friedland, K. D., and D. G. Reddin. 1994. Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:91-98.
14. Gold, J. R., A. Y. Kristmundsdottir, and L. R. Richardson. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA variation in king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) from the western Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Marine Biology 129:221- 232.
15. Gold, J. R., E. Pak, and D. A. DeVries. 2002. Population structure of king mackerel (Scomberomorus cavalla) around peninsular Florida, as revealed by microsatellite DNA. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 100:491-509.
16. Johnson, A. G., W. A. Fable, Jr., C. B. Grimes, L. Trent, and J. V. Perez. 1994. Evidence for distinct stocks of king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 92:91-101.
17. Legault, C. M. 1998. What if mixing area fish are assigned to the Atlantic migratory group instead of the Gulf of Mexico group? Southeast Fishery Science Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Contribution SFD-97/ 98-12, Miami.
18. Manooch, C. S., III. 1979. Recreational and commercial fisheries for king mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, in the South Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A. Pages 33-41 in E. L. Nakamura and H. R. Bullis, Jr., editors, Proceedings of colloquium on the Spanish and king mackerel resources of the Gulf of Mexico. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Technical Report 4, Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
19. Pothin, K., C. Gonzalez-Salas, P. Chabanet, and R. Lecomte- Finiger. 2006. Distinction between Mulloidichthys flavolineatus juveniles from Reunion Island and Mauritius Island (southwest Indian Ocean) based on otolith morphometrics. Journal of Fish Biology 68:1-16.
20. Powers, J. E. 1996. Benchmark requirements for recovering fish stocks. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:495-504.
21. SAS Institute. 1996. Statistics, version 6.11. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
22. Scheiner, S. M. 2001. MANOVA: multiple response variables and multispecies interactions: design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. SEDAR16 (Southeast Data Assessment and Review 16). 2008. Virtual population analyses of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic king mackerel migratory groups. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, publisher-loc>SEDAR16 Final Report, Miami.
24. Shepard, K. E. 2008. King mackerel population dynamics and stock mixing in the United States Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Master's thesis. University of West Florida, Pensacola.
25. Smith, M. K. 1992. Regional differences in otolith morphology of the deep slope red snapper Etelis carbunculus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:795-804.
26. Sutter, F. C., R. O. Williams, and M. F. Godcharles. 1991. Movement patterns and stock affinities of king mackerel in the southeastern United States. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 89:315-324.