Benchmark requirements for recovering fish stocks

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 495-504

  Powers, Joseph E ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029820930     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0495:BRFRFS>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Goodyear, C. P. 1980. Compensation in fish populations. Pages 253-280 in C. H. Hocutt and J. R. Stauffer. Jr., editors. Biological monitoring of fish. Heath. Lexington. Mass.
2. Goodyear, C. P. 1990. Spawning stock biomass per recruit: the biological basis for a fisheries management tool. ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) Collective Volume of Scientific Papers 32:487-497. (Madrid.)
3. Goodyear, C. P. 1993. Spawning stock biomass per recruit in fisheries management: foundation and current use. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 120:67-81.
4. Goodyear, C. P., and P. Phares. 1990. Status of red snapper stocks of the Gulf of Mexico: report for 1990. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami Laboratory, Contribution CRD 89/90-05. Miami.
5. Gulland, J. A., and L. K. Boerema. 1973. Scientific advice on catch levels. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 71:325-335.
6. Mace, P. M., and M. P. Sissenwine. 1993. Risk evaluation and biological reference points for fisheries management. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 120:101-118.
7. Powers, J. E. 1995, Non-equilibrium measures of the spawning potential ratio. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami Laboratory Contribution MIA 94/95-17. Miami.
8. Powers, J. E., N. C. Parrack, and P. Phares. 1995. Projections of the status of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic king mackerel and Spanish mackerel. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Miami Laboratory Contribution MIA 94/95-28, Miami.
9. Powers, J. E., and V. R. Restrepo. 1992. Additional options for age-sequenced analysis. ICCAT (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tbnas) Collective Volume of Scientific Papers 35:355-361. (Madrid.)
10. Powers, J. E., and V. R. Restrepo. 1993. Evaluation of stock assessment research for Gulf of Mexico king mackerel: benefits and costs to management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:1526.
11. Restrepo, V. R., and A. A. Rosenberg. 1994. Evaluating the performance of harvest control laws under uncertainty via simulation. International Council for Exploration of the Sea, Longterm Management Measures Working Group. WD18, Miami.
12. Rosenberg, A., and S. Brault. 1993. Choosing a management strategy for stock rebuilding when control is uncertain. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 120:243-249.
13. Rosenberg, A., and fourteen coauthors. 1994. Scientific review of definitions of overfishing in U.S. fishery management plans. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington. D.C.
14. Rosenberg, A., S. Swartz, and G. Darcy. 1993. The scientific basis for definitions of overfishing in the United States. Pages 6-18 in A. A. Rosenberg, editor. Report of the Second Annual National Stock Assessment Workshop. NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration) Technical Memorandum NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) Memorandum F/SPO-8, Washington, D.C.
15. Sissenwine, M. P., and J. G. Shepherd. 1987. An alternative perspective on recruitment overfishing and biological reference points. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:913-918.