MLPA as a screening method of aneuploidy and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements in spontaneous miscarriages

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 765-771

  Diego Alvarez, Dan ^a,b   De Alba, Marta Rodriguez ^a   Cardero Merlo, Rocio ^a   Diaz Recasens, Joaquin ^a   Ayuso, Carmen ^a   Ramos, Carmen ^a   Lorda Sanchez, Isabel ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO FUNDACIÓN JIMÉNEZ DÍAZ   (Spain)

^b Hospital UniversitarioFundación Jiménez Díaz   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Miscarriage; MLPA; QF PCR; Spontaneous abortion

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KARYOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPROCAL CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA; FEMALE; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 34547786121     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1777     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benkhalifa M, Kasakyan S, Clement P, et al. 2005. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro. Prenat Diagn 25(10): 894-900.
2. Bruno DL, Burgess T, Ren H, et al. 2006. High-throughput analysis of chromosome abnormality in spontaneous miscarriage using an MLPA subtelomere assay with an ancillary FISH test for polyploidy. Am J Med Genet A 140A: 2786-2793.
3. de Vries BB, Pfundt R, Leisink M, et al. 2005. Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 77(4): 606-616.
4. Diego-Alvarez D, Garcia-Hoyos M, Trujillo MJ, et al. 2005. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages. Hum Reprod 20(5): 1235-1243.
5. Diego-Alvarez D, Ramos-Corrales C, Garcia-Hoyos M, et al. 2006. Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Hum Reprod 21(4): 958-966.
6. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, et al. 2001. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 9(7): 539-547.
7. Gerdes T, Kirchhoff M, Lind AM, Larsen GV, Schwartz M, Lundsteen C. 2005. Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Eur J Hum Genet 13(2): 171-175.
8. Guerneri S, Bettio D, Simoni G, Brambati B, Lanzani A, Fraccaro M. 1987. Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortions. Hum Reprod 2(8): 735-739.
9. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, et al. 1980. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 44(Pt 2): 151-178.
10. Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, et al. 2005. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Prenat Diagn 25(11): 1032-1039.
11. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, et al. 2004. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36(9): 949-951.
12. Jobanputra V, Sobrino A, Kinney A, Kline J, Warburton D. 2002. Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions. Hum Reprod 17(5): 1166-1170.
13. Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. 2000. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 66(5): 1516-1521.
14. Menasha J, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Kardon NB. 2005. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study. Genet Med 7(4): 251-263.
15. Nagaishi M, Yamamoto T, Iinuma K, Shimomura K, Berend SA, Knops J. 2004. Chromosome abnormalities identified in 347 spontaneous abortions collected in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30(3): 237-241.
16. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. 2006. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444(7118): 444-454.
17. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C. 2004. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet 74(6): 1168-1174.
18. Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. 2002. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 30(12): e57.
19. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, et al. 2004. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305(5683): 525-528.
20. Sharp AJ, Locke DP, McGrath SD, et al. 2005. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 77(1): 78-88.
21. Slater HR, Bruno DL, Ren H, Pertile M, Schouten JP, Choo KH. 2003. Rapid, high throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA). J Med Genet 40(12): 907-912.