Mammography screening trends: The perspective of African American women born pre/post World War II

Journal of the National Medical Association

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 452-460

  Williams, Karen Patricia ^a,b   Mabiso, Athur ^a   Lo, Yun Jia ^a   Penner, Louis A ^b,c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; BABY BOOMER; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LINEAR SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WAR; AGE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ETHNOLOGY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WORLD WAR II;

EID: 77954924588     PISSN: 00279684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30552-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Espey DK, Wu X, Swan J, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Cancer. 2007;110:2119-2153.
2. National Cancer Institute. (2009). SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006: Cancer of the Breast (Invasive). http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975- 2006/browse-csr.php?section=4&page=sect-04-table.10.html#table3table3. Accessed July 20, 2009.
3. National Cancer Institute. (2009). SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2005. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2005/results-merged/sect-04-breast. pdf. Accessed July 20, 2009.
4. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3-27.
5. Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Gebretsadik T, et al. Is screening mammography effective in elderly women? Am J Med. 2000;108:112-119. (Pubitemid 30064421)
6. Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, et al. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:326-331. (Pubitemid 23210686)
7. McWilliams JM, Zaslavsky AM, Meara E, et al. Health insurance coverage and mortality among the near-elderly. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:223-233. (Pubitemid 38952401)
8. Mandelblatt JM, Yabroff KR. Breast and cervical cancer screening for older women: recommendations and challenges in the 21st century. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2000;55:210-215.
9. Saywell RM Jr, Champion VL, Zollinger TW, et al. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:33-44.
10. Roetzheim RG, Fox SA, Leake B. Physician-reported determinants of screening mammography in older women: the impact of physician and practice characteristics. Am J Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:1398-1402.
11. Williams KP, Sheppard VB, Todem D, et al. Family matters in mammography screening among African American women 40 and older. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100:508-515.
12. Fox SA, Stein JA, Sockloskie RJ, et al. Targeted mailed materials and the medicare beneficiary: increasing mammography screening among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:55-61.
13. Mandelblatt JS, Schechter CB, Yabroff KR, et al. Toward optimal screening strategies for older women: costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:487-496.
14. Sykes LL. Income rich and asset poor: a multilevel analysis of racial and ethnic differences in housing values among baby boomers. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2003;22:1-20.
15. Ekerdt DJ, Applebaum RA, Holden K, et al. Encyclopedia of Aging. New York: Macmillan Reference USA; 2002.
16. Easterlin RA, Schaeffer CM, Macunovich DJ. Will the baby boomers be less well off than their parents? Income, wealth and family circumstances over the life cycle in the United States. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19:497-522.
17. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:328-335.
18. Kirscht JP. The Health Belief Model and illness behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:387-408.
19. Jones IR, Higgs P, Ekerdt DJ. Consumption and generational change: the rise of consumer lifestyles and the transformation of later life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 2009.
20. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. Baby boomer retirement security: the roles of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. J Monetary Econ. 2007;54:205-224.
21. Ostbye T, Greenberg GN, Taylor DH, et al. Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: results from the Health Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:209-214.
22. Hauser RM, Willis RJ. Screening mammography and pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: results from the Health Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old. Popul Dev Rev. 2005;30:209-235.
23. Jenkins KR, Ofstedal MB, Weir D. Documentation of health behaviors and risk factors measured in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS/AHEAD). HRS Documentation Report DR-010. 2008.
24. Servais MA. (2009). Overview of HRS public data files for cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/dmgt/ OverviewofHRSPublicData.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2009.
25. Servais MA. (2004). An elementary cookbook of data management using HRS data with SPSS, SAS, and Stata examples. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/ sitedocs/dmgt/ElementaryCookbook.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2009.
26. Heeringa S, Connor J. Technical description of the health and retirement study sample design. HRS/AHEAD documentation report DR-002. 1995.
27. Juster F, Suzman R. An overview of the Health and Retirement Study. J Hum Resources. 1995;30:S7-S57.
28. SPSS Inc. SPSS Software Version 17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc; 2009.
29. SSI Inc. Hierarchical Linear Model Version 6.06. Lincolnwood, IL: SSI Inc; 2008.
30. Lane DS, Zapka JG, Breen N, et al. A Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care: The Case of Breast Cancer Screening among Older Women. Prev Med. 2000;31:481-493.
31. Lambrew JM, DeFriese GH, Carey TS, et al. The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care. 1996;34:138-151.
32. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, et al. Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:1499-1502. (Pubitemid 19270293)
33. Weinick RM, Zuvekas SH, Drilea S. (1997). MEPS Research Findings No. 3: Access to health care - sources and barriers, 1996. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHCPR Publication No. 98-0001. www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data-files/publications/rf3/rf3.shtml. Accessed July 20, 2009.
34. Rimer BK. Improving the use of cancer screening for older women. Cancer. 1993;72:1084-1087.
35. American Cancer Society. (2009). American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED-2-3X-ACS- Cancer-Detection-Guidelines-36.asp. Accessed July 20, 2009.
36. Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer. 2004;101:1146-1164.
37. Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med. 2004;38:754-760. (Pubitemid 38757524)
38. Armstrong K. Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:390-391.
39. Burgess DJ, Powell AA, Griffin JM, et al. Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors: development of a conceptual model Prev Med. 2009;48:99-107.
40. Calvocoressi L, Kasl S, Lee C, et al. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:2096-2105. (Pubitemid 40054304)