In-vivo blood velocity and velocity gradient profiles downstream of stented and stentless aortic heart valves

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 292-303

  Funder, Jonas A ^a   Frost, Markus W ^a   Ringgaard, Steffen ^a   Klaaborg, Kaj Erik ^a   Wierup, Per ^a   Hjortdal, Vibeke ^a   Nygaard, Hans ^a   Hasenkam, J Michael ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; FENTANYL CITRATE; HEPARIN; KETAMINE; METHYLPREDNISOLONE; METHYLPREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE; MIDAZOLAM; MIDAZOLAM MALEATE; PANCURONIUM; PANCURONIUM BROMIDE;

ANALGESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FLOWMETER; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENTED VALVE PROSTHESIS; STENTLESS VALVE PROSTHESIS; SWINE; SYSTOLE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANIMAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SWINE;

EID: 77954895917     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jin XY, Pepper JR. Do stentless valves make a difference? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:95-100
2. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: A large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80: 2180-2185
3. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, Di Bella I, De Gasperis C. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: Homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:966-971 (Pubitemid 29238282)
4. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de Oliveira OC, da Costa IM, Vrandecic E. Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:46-53
5. Stacchino C, Bona G, Rinaldi S, Vallana F. Design and performance characteristics of the Pericarbon stentless valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:102-105
6. Walkes JC, Reardon MJ. Current thinking in stentless valve surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003;18: 117-123
7. Hazekamp MG, Goffin YA, Huysmans HA. The value of the stentless biovalve prosthesis. An experimental study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993;7: 514-519
8. Dagum P, Green GR, Nistal FJ, et al. Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: Modes and physiologic determinants. Circulation 1999;100:1154-1162
9. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, et al. Aortic root dynamics are asymmetric. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:400-407 (Pubitemid 47050755)
10. Nygaard H, Paulsen P, Hasenkam J, Rovsing PE. Turbulent stresses downstream of three mechanical aortic valve prostheses in human beings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:438-446
11. Matsue H, Sawa, Y, Toshiki T, et al. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: Surgical consideration. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13:60-66
12. Matsue H, Sawa Y, Matsumiya G, Matsuda H, Hamada S. Mid-term results of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: Clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:630-636
13. Repossini A, Kotelnikov I, Bouchikihi R, et al. Single-suture line placement of a pericardial stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130: 1265-1269 (Pubitemid 41543193)
14. Smerup M, Pedersen TF, Nyboe C, et al. A long-term porcine model for evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Heart Surg Forum 2004;7:E259-E264
15. Hasenkam JM, Ringgaard S, Houlind K, et al. Prosthetic heart valve evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:300-305
16. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M. Phase-contrast MR imaging: Basic facts and implementation. RadioGraphics 2002;22:651-671
17. Smerup M, Funder JA, Nyboe C, et al. Strut chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement preserves long-term ventricular shape and function in pigs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1675-1682
18. Nyboe C, Funder JA, Smerup M, Nygaard H, Hasenkam JM. Turbulent stress measurements downstream of three bileaflet heart valve designs in pigs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:1008-1013 (Pubitemid 43728587)