An abstract argumentation framework with varied-strength attacks

Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 135-143

  Martínez, Diego C ^a   García, Alejandro J ^a   Simari, Guillermo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ABSTRACT NOTIONS; ADMISSIBLE SET; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 77954885825     PISSN: 23341025     EISSN: 23341033     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Amgoud, L., and Cayrol, C. 1998. On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'98), 1-7. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Amgoud, L., and Cayrol, C. 2002. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. In Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, 1-3. 197-215.
3. Amgoud, L., and Perrussel, L. 2000. Arguments and Contextual Preferences. In Proc. of the Computational Dialectics-ECAI Workshop (CD2000), Berlin.
4. Bench-Capon, T. 2002. Value-based argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 444-453.
5. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2):321-358.
6. Elvang-Goransson, M., and Hunter, A. 1995. Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information. Data Knowledge Engineering 16(2):125-145.
7. García, A. J., and Simari, G. R. 2004. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1-2):95-138.
8. Martínez, D.; García, A.; and Simari, G. 2006a. On acceptability in abstract argumentation frameworks with an extended defeat relation. In Proc. of I Intl. Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments, COMMA 2006, 273-278.
9. Martínez, D.; García, A.; and Simari, G. 2006b. Progressive defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the 19th Conf. of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence 2006, 242-253.
10. Martínez, D.; García, A.; and Simari, G. 2007. Modelling well-structured argumentation lines. In Proc. of XX IJCAI- 2007., 465-470.
11. Martínez, D.; García, A.; and Simari, G. 2008. Strong and weak forms of argument defense. In Proc. of II International Conf. on Computational Models of Arguments, COMMA 2008. Toulouse, France., 216-217.
12. Tohme, F.; Bodanza, G.; and Simari, G. 2008. Aggregation of attack relations: A social-choice theoretical analysis of defeasibility criteria. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS). February 11-15, 2008, Pisa, Italy,
13. Vreeswijk, G. A. W. 1997. Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence 90(1-2):225-279.