Modelling well-structured argumentation lines

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 465-470

  Martínez, Diego C ^a   García, Alejandro J ^a   Simari, Guillermo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; DEFEASIBLE REASONING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84880877940     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Leila Amgoud and Claudette Cayrol. On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'98), Madison, Wisconsin, pages 1-7, San Francisco,California, juillet 1998. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Leila Amgoud and Laurent Perrussel. Arguments and Contextual Preferences. In Computational Dialectics-Ecai workshop (CD2000), Berlin, August 2000.
3. Leila Amgoud. Using preferences to select acceptable arguments. In Proc. of European Conference in Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'98), Brighton, pages 43-44, New-York, August 1998. John Wiley & sons.
4. T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Value-based argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pages 444-453, 2002.
5. Phan M. Dung. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nomonotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming. In Proc. of the 13th. International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Chambéry, Francia, pages 852-857, 1993.
6. Alejandro J. García and Guillermo R. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4(1):95-138, 2004.
7. Hadassa Jakobovits and Dirk Vermeir. Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks. In ICAIL, pages 53-62, 1999.
8. Hadassa Jakobovits. Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(2):215-261, 1999.
9. Robert A. Kowalski and Francesca Toni. Abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(3-4):275-296, 1996.
10. John Pollock. Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11:481-518, 1987.
11. Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor. A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities. In Dov M. Gabbay and Hans Jürgen Ohlbach, editors, Proc. of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR-96), volume 1085 of LNAI, pages 510-524, Berlin, June 3-7 1996. Springer.
12. Guillermo R. Simari and Ronald P. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125-157, 1992.
13. Guillermo R. Simari, Carlos I. Chesñevar, and Alejandro J. García. The role of dialectics in defeasible argumentation. In XIV International Conference of the Chilenean Computer Science Society, pages 111-121, November 1994.
14. Frieder Stolzenburg, Alejandro J. García, Carlos I. Chesñevar, and Guillermo R. Simari. Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Aplied Non-Classical Logics, 13(1):87-113, January 2003.
15. Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk. Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90(1-2):225-279, 1997.