Alternative normalization schemas for Bayesian confirmation measures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6178 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 230-239

  Greco, Salvatore ^a   Słowiński, Roman ^b,c   Szczȩch, Izabela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bayesian confirmation measures; Normalization; property Ex 1

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN CONFIRMATION; EQUIVALENT MEASURE; NORMALIZATION PROPERTIES; RESEARCH AREAS; RULE INTERESTINGNESS; SCHEMAS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 77954883425     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14049-5_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bramer, M.: Principles of Data Mining. Springer, New York (2007)
2. Carnap, R.: Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)
3. Christensen, D.: Measuring confirmation. Journal of Philosophy 96, 437-461 (1999)
4. Crupi, V., Tentori, K., Gonzalez, M.: On Bayesian measures of evidential support: Theoretical and empirical issues. Philosophy of Science (2007)
5. Eells, E., Fitelson, B.: Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support. Philosophical Studies 107(2), 129-142 (2002)
6. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview. In: Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., Uthursamy, R. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discov. and Data Mining, pp. 1-34. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)
7. Finch, H.A.: Confirming Power of Observations Metricized for Decisions among Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 27, 293-307, 391-404 (1999)
8. Fitelson, B.: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison (2001)
9. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.J.: Interestingness Measures for Data Mining: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, article 9 38(3) (2006)
10. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Slowínski, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Eng. Application of Artif. Intelligence 17, 345-361 (2004)
11. Greco, S., Sowiski, R., Szczch, I.: Assessing the quality of rules with a new monotonic interestingness measure Z. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol.5097, pp. 556-565. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
12. Hempel, C.G.: Studies in the logic of confirmation (I). Mind 54, 1-26 (1945)
13. McGarry, K.: A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review 20(1), 39-61 (2005)
14. Mortimer, H.: The Logic of Induction. Paramus/Prentice Hall (1988)
15. Nicod, J.: Le probleme de la logique de l'induction. Alcan, Paris (1923)
16. Nozick, R.: Philosophical Explanations. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1981)
17. Rips, L.J.: Two Kinds of Reasoning. Psychological Science 12, 129-134 (2001)
18. Szcz̧ech, I.: Multicriteria Attractiveness Evaluation of Decision and Association Rules. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Wolski, M., Chakraborty, M.K., Wu, W.-Z. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets X. LNCS, vol.5656, pp. 197-274. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
19. Tan, P.-N., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In: Proc. of the 8th international Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2002), Edmonton, Canada, pp. 32-41 (2002)