Comparison of clinical characteristics between automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A 2-year single-center observational study

Renal Failure

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 817-824

  Su, Yu Jen ^a   Lee, Chien Te ^a   Chuang, Feng Rong ^a   Lee, Chih Hsiung ^a   Wang, Yi Chun ^a   Cheng, Ben Chung ^a   Hsu, Kuo Tai ^a   Chen, Jin Bor ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Automated peritoneal dialysis; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; Peritonitis; Residual renal function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954881804     PISSN: 0886022X     EISSN: 15256049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2010.494799     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Lameire NH. The impact of residual renal function on the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephron. 1997;77:14-28.
2. Moist LM, Port FK, Orzol SM, et al. Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:556-564.
3. Jansen MA, Hart AA, Korevaar JC, et al. Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62:1046-1053.
4. CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Group. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:198-207.
5. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. For the CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. The importance of residual renal function for survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:185A (Abstract).
6. Hiroshige K, Yuu K, Soejima M, et al. Rapid decline of residual renal function in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16:307-315.
7. Hufnagel G, Michel C, Queffeulou G, et al. The influence of automated peritoneal dialysis on the decrease in residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:1224-1228.
8. Holley JL, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower rates of catheter infections than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;16:133-136. (Pubitemid 20304981)
9. Brunkhorst R, Wrenger E, Krautzig S, et al. Clinical experience with home automated peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 1994;46(Suppl. 48):S25-30.
10. Korbet SM, Vonesh EF, Firanek CA. Peritonitis in an urban peritoneal dialysis program: An analysis of infecting pathogens. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:47-53.
11. Rodríguez-Carmona A, Pérez Fontán M, García Falcón T, et al. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19:253-258.
12. Rodby RA, Firanek CA, Cheng YG, et al. Reproducibility of studies of peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Kidney Int. 1996;50:267-271.
13. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: A reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:2158-2162.
14. Kieman L, Kliger A, Gorban-Brennan N, et al. Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related infections with different 'Y-tubing' exchange systems. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;5:1835-1837.
15. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, et al. Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:2991-2998.
16. Singhal MK, Bhaskaran S, Vidgen E, et al. Rate of decline of residual renal function in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis and factors affecting it. Perit Dial Int. 2000;20:429-438.
17. Lysaght MJ, Vonesh EF, Gotch F, et al. The influence of dialysis treatment modality on decline of remaining renal function. ASAIO Trans. 1991;37:598-604.
18. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861-869.
19. Mora-Macia J, Cases A, Calero F, et al. Effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on renal disease progression in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:82-84.
20. Li PK, Chow KM, Wong TY, et al. Effects of an angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor on residual renal function in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. A randomized, controlled study. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:105-112.
21. Suzuki H, Kanno Y, Sugahara S, et al. Effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, valsartan, on residual renal function in patients on CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:1056-1064.
22. Akbari A, Knoll G, Ferguson D, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in peritoneal dialysis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perit Dial Int. 2009;29:554-561.
23. Shin SK, Noh H, Kang SW, et al. Risk factors influencing the decline of residual renal function in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19:138-142.
24. Port FK, Held PJ, Nolph KD, et al. Risk of peritonitis and technique failure by CAPD connection technique. A national study. Kidney Int. 1992;42:967-974.
25. Alexander SR, Sullivan EK, Harmon WE, et al. Maintenance dialysis in North American children and adolescents: A preliminary report. North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS). Kidney Int. 1993;44(Suppl. 43):S104-109.
26. Lavender S, Hilton PJ, Jones NF. The measurement of glomerular filtration rate in renal disease. Lancet. 1969;2:1216-1219.
27. De Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ, et al. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:264-271.
28. Brunkhorst RR. Individualized PD prescription: APD versus CAPD. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(Suppl. 3):S92-94.
29. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int. 2009;76:97-107.