Using the table reading test as an indicator for success in pilot training

Collegiate Aviation Review

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 101-114

  Mekhail, Anthony ^a   Niemczyk, Mary ^a   Ulrich, Jon W ^a   Karp, Merrill ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954859857     PISSN: 15235955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22488/okstate.18.100404     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ackerman, P., Cianciolo, A. (2000). Cognitive, Perceptual-speed, and Psychomotor Determinants of Individual Differences During Skill Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4), 259-290.
2. Ambler, R. K., & Waters, L. K. (1967). The Value of an NROTC Flight Indoctrination Program to Naval Aviation Training. Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Center.
3. Bailey, M., & Woodhead, R. (1996). Current Status and Future Developments of RAF Aircrew Selection. Selection and Training Advances in Aviation: AGARD Conference Proceedings 588 (81-89). Prague, Czech Republic: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development.
4. Bair, J. T., Lockman, R. F., & Martoccia, C. T. (1956). Validity and Factor analysis of Naval Air Training Predictor and Criterion Measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40(4), 213-219.
5. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Carretta, T., & Ree, M. (1995). Air Force Officer Qualifying Test Validity for Predicting Pilot Training Performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9(4), 379-388.
7. Carretta, T., & Ree, M. (1996). Central Role of g in Military Pilot Selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 111-123.
8. Carretta, T., & Ree, M. (1998). Computerized Testing in the United States Air Force. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(2), 82-89.
9. Carretta, T., & Ree, M. (2000). Pilot Selection Methods. (USAF Research Laboratory No. AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2000-0116). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Retrieved on January 27, 2009 from http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD= ADA384132&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.
10. Damos, D. (1996). Pilot Selection Batteries: Shortcomings and Perspectives. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 199-209.
11. Damos, D. (2004). Table Reading Test Version 2. Los Angeles, CA: Damos Aviation Services.
12. Di Iorio, C. K. (2005). Measurement in Health Behavior: Methods for Research and Education (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Fiske, D. W. (1947). Validation of Naval Aviation Cadet Selection Tests Against Training Criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31(6), 601-614.
14. Ghiselli, E. (1966). The Validity of Occupational Aptitude Tests. New York: Wiley.
15. Gnan, M., Flynn, C., & King, R. (1995). (AL/AO-TR-1995-0003). Brooks Air Force Base, TX. Retrieved on July 25, 2009, from http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/ GetTRDoc? AD=ADA 293779 & Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.
16. Goeters, K. (Ed.). (1998). Aviation Psychology: A Science and a Profession. Hants, England; Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
17. Goeters, K. (Ed.). (2004). Aviation Psychology: Practice and Research. Hampshire, England; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
18. Griffin, G., & Koonce, J. (1996). Review of Psychomotor Skills in Pilot Selection Research of the U.S. Military Services. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 125-147.
19. Henmon, V. A. C. (1919). Air Service Tests of Aptitude for Flying. Journal of Applied Psychology. 3(2), 103-109.
20. Hörmann, H. & Maschke, P. (1996). On the Relation Between Personality and Job Performance of Airline Pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 171-178.
21. Hunter, D. R., & Burke, E. F. (1995). Handbook of Pilot Selection. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate Publishing Company.
22. Martinussen, M. & Torjussen, T. (1998). Pilot Selection in the Norwegian Air Force: A Validation and Meta-Analysis of the Test Battery. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(1), 33-45.
23. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences From Persons' Responses and Performance as Scientific Inquiry Into Score Meaning. American Psychologist. 50(9), 741-749.
24. Mount, M., Oh, I., & Burns, M. (2008). Incremental Validity of Perceptual Speed and Accuracy Over General Mental Ability. Personnel Psychology, 61, 113-139.
25. North, R. A., & Griffin, G. R. (1977). Aviator Selection 1919-1977 (Special Report 77-2). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
26. Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1980). Validity Generalization Results for Tests Used to Predict Job Proficiency and Training Success in Clerical Operations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 518-524.
27. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Signori, E. I. (1949). The Arnprior Experiment: A Study of World War II Pilot Selection Procedures in the RCAF and RAF. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 3(3), 136-150.
29. Taylor, C. W., Murray, S. L., Ellison, R. L., & Majesty, M. S. (1971). Development of Motivation Assessment Techniques for Air Force Officer Training and Education Programs: Motivation for Pilot Training. (AFHRL-TR-71-21). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Professional Education Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
30. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques. New York: J. Wiley.
31. Trankell, A. (1959). The Psychologist as an Instrument of Prediction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(3), 170-175.
32. Walters, L. C., Miller, M. R., & Ree, M. J. (1993). Structured Interviews for Pilot Selection: No Incremental Validity. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 25-38.
33. Want, R. L. (1962). The Validity of Tests in the Selection of Air Force Pilots. Australian Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 133-139.
34. Woycheshin, D. (2002). Validation of the Canadian Automated Pilot Selection System (CAPSS) Against Primary Flying Training Results. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34(2), 84-89.