Current and future applications of toxicogenomics: Results summary of a survey from the HESI genomics state of science subcommittee

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 118, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 992-997

  Pettit, Syril ^a   des Etages, Shelley Ann ^b   Mylecraine, Louis ^c   Snyder, Ronald ^d   Fostel, Jennifer ^e   Dunn II, Robert T ^f   Haymes, Kenneth ^g   Duval, Manuel ^b   Stevens, James ^h   Afshari, Cynthia ^f   Vickers, Alison ⁱ  

^a ILSI HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

^c BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

^d MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^e SRA International Inc   (United States)

^f AMGEN INC   (United States)

^g U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^h ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

ⁱ ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Applications; HESI survey; Impact and hurdles; Toxicogenomics

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DNA MICROARRAY; EUROPE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RELIABILITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TOXICOGENETICS; UNITED STATES; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; INTERNET; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES; TOXICITY; TRENDS;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DATA COLLECTION; EUROPE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; JAPAN; MEDICAL LABORATORY PERSONNEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOGENETICS; UNITED STATES; XENOBIOTICS;

EID: 77954851439     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901501     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chanrion M, Fontaine H, Rodriguez C, Negre V, Bibeau F, Theillet C, et al. 2007. A new molecular breast cancer subclass defined from a large scale real-time quantitative RT-PCR study. BMC Cancer 7:39-50.
2. National Research Council. 2007. Applications of Toxicogenomic Technologies to Predictive Toxicology and Risk Assessment. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
3. Dressman HK, Berchuck A, Chan G, Zhai J, Bild A, Sayer R, et al. 2007. An integrated genomic-based approach to individualized treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(5):517-525.
4. European Medicines Agency. 2009. Scientific Guidelines for Human Medicinal Products. Available: http://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/human/humanguidelines/multidiscipline.htm [accessed 18 December 2009].
5. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2007. Guidance for Industry: Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions-Companion Guidance. Draft Guidance. Available: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm079855.pdf [accessed 18 December 2009].
6. FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2009. Genomic Data Submission. Available: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/Pharmacogenetics/ucm083641.htm [accessed 18 December 2009].
7. Foster WR, Chen SJ, He A, Truong A, Bhaskaran V, Nelson DM, et al. 2007. A retrospective analysis of toxicogenomics in the safety assessment of drug candidates. Toxicol Pathol 35(5):621-635.
8. Gant TW. 2007. Novel and future applications of microarrays in toxicological research. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 3(4):599-608.
9. ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. 2009. HESI Survey on the State of the Science and Future Directions in Toxicogenomics. Available: http://www.hesiglobal.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3481 [accessed 18 December 2009].
10. Rimkus C, Friederichs J, Boulesteix AL, Theisen J, Mages J, Becker K, et al. 2008. Microarray-based prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(1):53-61.
11. Rivera SP, Saarikoski ST, Sun W, Hankinson O. 2007. Identification of novel dioxin-responsive genes by representational difference analysis. Xenobiotica 37(3):271-279.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. External Review Draft of the Interim Guidance for Microarray-Based Assays: Data Submission, Quality, Analysis, Management and Training Considerations. Available: http://www.epa.gov/osa/spc/genomicsguidance.htm [accessed 18 December 2009].