Constituents' responses to congressional roll-call voting

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 583-597

  Ansolabehere, Stephen ^a   Jones, Philip Edward ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954845975     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00448.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Achen Christopher H. Measuring Representation. American Journal of Political Science 1978, 22(3):475-510.
2. Aldrich John H. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America 1995, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
3. Angrist Joshua D, Imbens Guido W, Rubin Donald B. Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996, 91(434):444-55.
4. Ansolabehere Stephen. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2006: Common Content 2008, http://web.mit.edu/polisci/portl/cces/index.html, Computer File, Release 3: June 2, 2008, Cambridge, MA, MIT, producer
5. Ansolabehere Stephen, Rodden Jonathan, Snyder James. The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 2008, 102(2):215-32.
6. "Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections." American Journal of Political Science 2001, 45(1):136-59. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr, and, Charles Stewart III
7. Arnold R Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action 1990, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
8. Burstein Paul. The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda. Political Research Quarterly 2003, 56:29-40.
9. Campbell Angus, Converse Philip E, Miller Warren E, Stokes Donald E. The American Voter 1960, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
10. Canes-Wrone Brandice, Brady David W, Cogan John F. Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting. American Political Science Review 2002, 96(1):127-40.
11. Converse Philip E. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Ideology and Discontent 1964, 206-61. Apter David. ed, New York, Free Press
12. Cox Gary W, McCubbins Matthew D. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House 1993, Berkeley, University of California Press
13. Delli Carpini Michael X, Keeter Scott. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters 1996, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
14. Erikson Robert S. Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data. American Journal of Political Science 1978, 22(3):511-35.
15. Erikson Robert S, MacKuen Michael B, Stimson James A. The Macro Polity 2002, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
16. Erikson Robert S, Wright Gerald S. Voters, Candidates and Issues in Congressional Elections. Congress Reconsidered 1989, 77-106. Dodd Lawrence C, Oppenheimer Bruce I. In, 4th ed., ed, Washington, DC, CQ Press
17. Erikson Robert S, Wright Gerald S. Representation of Constituency Ideology in Congress. Continuity and Change in U. S. House Elections 2000, 149-77. Brady David W, Cogan John FFerejohn John. In, ed, Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University Press
18. Fenno Richard. Homestyle 1978, Boston, Little, Brown
19. Goren Paul. Political Sophistication and Policy Reasoning: A Reconsideration. American Journal of Political Science 2004, 48(3):462-78.
20. "Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election." American Political Science Review 2009, 103(1):59-82. Jesse, Stephen
21. Manza Jeff, Cook Fay. A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the U. S. American Politics Research 2002, 30:630-67.
22. Mayhew David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection 1974, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
23. Miller Warren E, Stokes Donald E. Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 1963, 57(1):45-56.
24. Page Benjamin I, Shapiro Robert Y. Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review 1983, 77(1):175-90.
25. Page Benjamin I, Shapiro Robert Y. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences 1992, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
26. Peffley Mark A, Hurwitz Jon. A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint. American Journal of Political Science 1985, 29(4):871-90.
27. Democracy, Accountability and Representation 1999, Przeworski AdamStokes Susan CManin Bernard. eds, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
28. Rabinowitz George, MacDonald Stuart Elaine. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 1989, 83(1):93-121.
29. Rahn Wendy. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 1993, 37(2):472-96.
30. Schickler Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress 2001, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
31. Stokes Donald E, Miller Warren E. Party Government and the Saliency of Congress. Public Opinion Quarterly 1962, 26(4):531-46.
32. Stone Walter. Measuring Constituency-Representative Linkages: Problems and Prospects. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1979, 4(4):623-39.
33. Tourangeau Roger, Couper Mick P, Conrad Frederick. Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 2004, 68(3):368-93.
34. Weissberg Robert. Assessing Legislator-Constituency Policy Agreement. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1979, 4(4):605-22.
35. Wolpert Robin M, Gimpel James G. Information, Recall, and Accountability: The Electorate's Response to the Clarence Thomas Nomination. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1997, 22(4):535-50.