Communication experiences for the older hearing-impaired - The uptake and usage of modern communication devices

Health Care and Informatics Review Online

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Jerram, J C K ^a   Kent, B ^a   Searchfield, G D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954839104     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11764201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. Hearing Impairment and Social Isolation in the Elderly. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1982;25:593-9.
2. McCreadie C. Older pedestrians, mobile phones and new way-finding technology: First stage of new research. Gerontechnology. 2005;4(1):5-14.
3. Galluci M, Antuono P, Ongaro F, Forloni PL, Albani D, Amici GP, et al. Physical activity, socialization and reading in the elderly over the age of seventy: What is the relation with cognitive decline? Evidence from "The Treviso Longeva (TRELONG) study". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2008;48(3):284-6.
4. Flicker L, Lautenschlarger NT, Almedia OP. Healthy mental ageing. Menopause International. 2006;12(3):92-6.
5. Swindell R. U3As in Australia and New Zealand: society's $4 million bonanza. Comparative Education. 1999;35(2):235-47.
6. Jaeger B. Trapped in the Digital Divide? Old People in the Information Society. Science Studies. 2004;2:5-22.
7. Oppenauer C, Preschl B, Kalteis K, Kryspin-Exner I. Technology in old age from a psychological point of view. HCI and Usability for Medicine and Health Care. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2007:133-42.
8. Kurniawan S, Mahmud M, Nugroho Y. A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. Extended Abstracts of CHI'06. Montreal 2006:989-94.
9. Walsh SP, White KM, M YR. Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescence. 2007;31(1):77-92.
10. Kent B, Smith S. They only see it when the sun shines in my ears: exploring perceptions of adolescent hearing aid users. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2006;11(4):461-76.
11. Spradley J. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Rinehart & Winston 1979.
12. Aronson J. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report. 1994;2(1).
13. Taylor SJ, Bodan R. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The search for meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1984.
14. Zimmer Z, Chappell N. Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation; an International, Multidisciplinary journal. 1999;21(5-6):222-30.
15. Amoako-Gyampah K. Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioural intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behaviour. 2007;23(2):1232 - 48.
16. Kent B, La Grow S. The role of hope in adjustment to acquired hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology. 2007;46:328-40.
17. Garnes D. Hope and self-efficacy as motivational influences in technology adoption. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006;66(12-A).
18. Bruder C, Wendke H, Blessing L. Improving mobile phone manuals for seniors. Gerontology. 2006;5(1):51-6.
19. Omori M, Watanabe T, Takai J, Tadaka H, Miyao M. Visibility and characteristics of mobile phones for elderly people. Behaviour and Information Technology. 2002;24(5):313-6.
20. Yun MH, Han SH, Hong SW, Kim J. Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design. Ergonomics. 2003;43(13-1):1423-40.
21. Ziefle M. How older people meet Ageing complexity: Ageing effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behaviour and Information Technology. 2005;24(5):375-89.