Numerical studies of a one-dimensional three-spin spin-glass model with long-range interactions

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Larson, Derek ^a   Katzgraber, Helmut G ^b,c   Moore, M A ^d   Young, A P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954829972     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.064415     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. T. R. Kirkpatrick and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. A 35, 3072 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevA.35.3072
2. T. R. Kirkpatrick and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. B 36, 5388 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.5388
3. T. R. Kirkpatrick and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. B 36, 8552 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8552
4. W. Gotze and L. Sjogren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992). 10.1088/0034-4885/55/3/001
5. J.-P. Bouchaud, L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. Mézard, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by, A. P. Young, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
6. W. Kauzmann, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 43, 219 (1948). 10.1021/cr60135a002
7. G. Parisi, M. Picco, and F. Ritort, Phys. Rev. E 60, 58 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.58
8. H. Bokil, B. Drossel, and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 62, 946 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.946
9. T. Castellani, F. Krzakala, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Eur. Phys. J. B 47, 99 (2005). 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00293-1
10. M. A. Moore and B. Drossel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 217202 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.217202
11. J. R. L. de Almeida and D. J. Thouless, J. Phys. A 11, 983 (1978). 10.1088/0305-4470/11/5/028
12. H. G. Katzgraber and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 67, 134410 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.134410
13. H. G. Katzgraber and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 72, 184416 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.184416
14. L. Leuzzi, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107203 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.107203
15. L. Leuzzi, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 267201 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.267201
16. H. G. Katzgraber, D. Larson, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 177205 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.177205
17. G. Kotliar, P. W. Anderson, and D. L. Stein, Phys. Rev. B 27, 602 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.602
18. D. J. Gross, I. Kanter, and H. Sompolinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 304 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.304
19. M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 137202 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 137202
20. The model studied in Ref. has R = 0.88
21. J. Yeo, (private communication).
22. L. Viana and A. J. Bray, J. Phys. C 18, 3037 (1985). 10.1088/0022-3719/ 18/15/013
23. F. Cooper, B. Freedman, and D. Preston, Nucl. Phys. B 210, 210 (1982). 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90240-1
24. M. Palassini and S. Caracciolo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5128 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5128
25. H. G. Ballesteros, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Pech, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, A. Tarancon, P. Tellez, C. L. Ullod, and C. Ungil, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14237 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.14237
26. D. Amit and V. Matin-Mayor, Field Theory, The Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005).
27. For a discussion of how finite-size scaling is modified in the region of mean-field exponents, see, for example, Refs.
28. J. L. Jones and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 71, 174438 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.174438
29. M. E. Fisher, S.-k. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 917 (1972). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.917
30. D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 386 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.386
31. One can alternatively reexpress the FSS results in Eqs. in the following way. A thermodynamic quantity X has the finite-size scaling form X = L y X X [L y T (T - t c), L y H h], where y T = 1 / ν and y H = (d + 2 - η) / 2 are the thermal and magnetic exponents. The connection between LR and SR exponents is obtained by writing this in terms of the total number of spins N and equating the exponents, i.e., y T, LR = y T, SR / d eff, y H, LR = y H, SR / d eff, y X, LR = y X, SR / d eff. In the same way, the analogous result for the correction to scaling exponent ω is ω LR = ω SR / d eff. The relation involving y X does not apply for the correlation length since it refers to a linear dimension, rather than a volume, and so there is no factor of d eff, see Eq.
32. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 43, 119 (1981). 10.1007/BF01293604
33. H. G. Ballesteros, L. A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, and A. Muñoz Sudupe, Phys. Lett. B 387, 125 (1996). 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00984-7
34. M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 78, 214205 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.214205
35. K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1604 (1996). 10.1143/JPSJ.65.1604
36. H. G. Katzgraber, M. Palassini, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184422 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184422
37. K. Binder, M. Nauenberg, V. Privman, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 31, 1498 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.1498
38. E. Luijten, K. Binder, and H. W. J. Blöte, Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 289 (1999). 10.1007/s100510050768
39. This expression vanishes for σ = σ c = 2 / 3 as expected. Furthermore, using the connection between σ and the effective dimension of a short-range model in Eq., we have ω = ω SR / d with ω SR = (d - 6) / 2, as expected at the trivial Gaussian fixed point in a cubic field theory (Ref.).
40. E. Brézin, J. Phys. France 43, 15-22 (1982). 10.1051/jphys: 0198200430101500
41. E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B 257, 867 (1985). 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90379-7
42. A. B. Harris, T. C. Lubensky, and J.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 415 (1976). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.415