Finite-size scaling of the correlation length above the upper critical dimension in the five-dimensional Ising model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 17, 2005, Pages

  Jones, Jeff L ^a   Young, A P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33344476954     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.174438     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. M. N. Barber, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by, C. Domb, and, J. L. Lebowitz, (Academic, New York, 1983), Vol. 8, p. 146.
2. Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems, edited by, V. Privman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
3. V. Privman and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.322 30, 322 (1984).
4. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter ZPCMDN 0722-3277 10.1007/BF01293604 43, 119 (1981).
5. M. P. Nightingale, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/0378-4371(75)90021- 7 83, 561 (1976).
6. J. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1735 70, 1735 (1993).
7. E. Brézin, J. Phys. (France) JOPQAG 0302-0738 43, 15 (1982).
8. R. Kenna and C. B. Lang, Phys. Lett. B PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90367-Y 264, 396 (1991).
9. Erik Luijten (private communication) has pointed out that this prescription needs clarification in the presence of a magnetic field h. Standard FSS scaling functions then have a second argument, h Lσ, and the issue is what value to take for σ before the transformation L→l is made. If hyperscaling is satisfied then σ is equal to both yh = (d+2-η) 2 and Δν= (β+γ) ν. However, if hyperscaling is not satisfied, it is the latter expression that must be taken in order to get the correct behavior of bulk thermodynamic quantities. For d>4, we have (β+γ) ν=3 and, with the replacement L→l, the field enters the scaling functions in the combination h L3d4, in agreement with earlier work (see Refs.).
10. E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90379-7 257, 867 (1985).
11. K. Binder, M. Nauenberg, V. Privman, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.1498 31, 1498 (1985).
12. E. Luijten and H. W. J. Blöte, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1557 76, 1557 (1996).
13. H. W. J. Blöte and E. Luijten, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1997-00284-x 38, 565 (1997).
14. X. S. Chen and V. Dohm, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C IJMPEO 0129-1831 10.1142/S012918319800100X 9, 1073 (1998).
15. X. S. Chen and V. Dohm, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s100510050603 7, 183 (1999).
16. E. Luijten, K. Binder, and H. W. J. Blöte, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s100510050768 9, 289 (1999).
17. U. Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.361 62, 361 (1989).