Economic impact assessment in pest risk analysis

Crop Protection

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 517-524

  Soliman, T ^a   Mourits, M C M ^a   Oude Lansink, A G J M ^a   van der Werf, W ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Economic methods; Impact analysis; Pest invasion; Pest risk analysis; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC IMPACT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77954817388     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.014     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Anonymous Guidelines on pest risk analysis. EPPO Pest risk assessment scheme. EPPO Bull. 1997, 27:281-305.
2. Arpaia M.L.U., Stottlemyer D.E., Witney G.W. Economic analysis of irrigation and fertilization management of Avocados. Hortscience 1996, 31(1):156-159.
3. Arthur M. An Economic Analysis of Quarantine: The Economics of Australian's Ban on New Zealand Apple Imports 2006, 2006 Conference, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Nelson, New Zealand, 31959.
4. Baker R.H.A., Battisti A., Bremmer J., Kenis M., Mumford J., Pette r.F., Schrader G., Bacher S., De Barro P., Hulme P.E., Karadjova O., Oude Lansink A., Pruvost O., Pysek P., Roques A., Baranchikov Y., Sun J.-H. PRATIQUE: a research project to enhance pest risk analysis techniques in the European Union. EPPO Bull. 2009, 39:87-93.
5. Binns M.R., Nyrop J.P., van der Werf W. Sampling and Monitoring in Crop Protection: the Theoretical Basis for Developing Practical Decision Guides 2000, CABI Press, Wallingford, 284 pp.
6. Bourguignon F., Pereira da Silva L. The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution, Evaluation Techniques and Tools 2003, The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Breukers A., Mourits M., van der Werf W., Oude Lansink A. Costs and benefits of controlling quarantine diseases: a bio-economic modeling approach. Agric. Econ. 2008, 38:137-149.
8. Brown C.D., Davis H.T. Receiver operating characteristics curves and related decision measures: a tutorial. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 80:24-38.
9. Brunel S., Petter F., Fernandez-Galiano E., Smith I. Approach of the European and Mediterranean plant protection organization to the evaluation and management of risks presented by invasive alien plants. Management of Invasive Weeds 2009, 319-343. Springer, Netherlands. Inderjit (Ed.).
10. Chalak-Haghighi M., Van Ierland E.C., Bourdot G.W. Management strategies for an invasive weed: a dynamic programming approach for Californian thistle in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 2008, 51(4):409-424.
11. Cook D.C. Benefit cost analysis of an import access request. Food Policy 2008, 33(3):277-285.
12. Dixon P.B., Parmenter B.R. Computable general equilibrium modeling for policy analysis and forecasting. Handbook of Computational Economics 1996, vol. I. Elsevier Science B.V. H.M. Amman, D.A. Kendrick, J. Rust (Eds.).
13. Donovan C., Wopereis M.C.S., Guindo D., Nebié B. Soil fertility management in irrigated rice systems in the Sahel and Savanna regions of West Africa: part II. Profitability and risk analysis. Field Crops Res. 1999, 61(2):147-162.
14. Elliston L., Hinde R., Yainshet A. Plant disease incursion management. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. 2005, 3415:225-235.
15. Elobeld A., Beghin J. Multilateral trade and agricultural policy reforms in sugar markets. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 57(1):23-48.
16. FAO Pest Risk Analysis for Quarantine Pests Including Analysis of Environmental Risks. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 2004, Publication No. 11. Rev. 1, FAO, Rome (IT).
17. FAO Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 2007, Publication No. 05, FAO, Rome (IT).
18. FAO Framework for Pest Risk Analysis. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 2007, Publication No. 02, FAO, Rome (IT).
19. Gilligan C.A., van den Bosch F. Epidemiological models for invasion and persistence of pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 2008, 46:385-418.
20. Hal R.J., Hastings A. Minimizing invader impacts: striking the right balance between removal and restoration. J. Theor. Bio. 2007, 249(3):437-444.
21. Holland J. Tools for Institutional, Political, and Social Analysis of Policy Reform. A Source Book for Development Practitioners 2007, The World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, D.C.
22. IPPC Accessed 26.04.2009. https://www.ippc.int/IPP/En/default.jsp.
23. Juliá R., Holland D.W., Guenthner J. Assessing the economic impact of invasive species: the case of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) in the rangelands of Idaho, USA. J. Environ. Man. 2007, 85:876-882.
24. Just R.E., Hueth D.L., Schmitz A. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy 1982, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
25. Kaye-Blake W.H., Saunders C.M., Cagatay S. Genetic modification technology and producer returns: the impacts of productivity, preferences, and technology uptake. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2008, 30(4):692-710.
26. Leontief W. Input-Output Economics 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
27. Macleod A., Head J., Gaunt A. The assessment of the potential economic impact of Thrips palmi on horticulture in England and the significance of a successful eradication campaign. Crop Prot. 2003, 23:601-610.
28. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. Microeconomic Theory 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
29. Miller R., Blair P. Input Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions 1985, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
30. Nyrop J.P., Binns M.R., van der Werf W. Sampling for IPM decision making: where should we invest time and resources?. Phytopathology 1999, 89:1104-1111.
31. Pemsl D., Waibel H., Orphal J. A methodology to assess the profitability of Bt-cotton: case study results from the state of Karnataka, India. Crop Prot. 2004, 23(12):1249-1257.
32. Qaim M., Traxler G. Roundup ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agric. Econ. 2005, 32(1):73-86.
33. Rich K.M., Miller G.Y., Winter-Nilson A. A review of economic tools for the assessment of animal disease outbreaks. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2005, 24:833-845.
34. Sadoulet E., de Janvry A. Computable general equilibrium models. Quantitative Development Policy Analysis 1995, 341-372. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
35. Sansford, C. Quantitative Versus Qualitative: Pest Risk Analysis in the UK and Europe including the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection (EPPO) System. NAPPO International Symposium on Pest Risk Analysis Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, 2002.
36. Schmitz T.G., Giese C.R., Shultz C.J. Welfare implications of EU enlargement under the CAP. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2008, 56(4):555-562.
37. Surkov I.V., Oude Lansink A.G.J.M., van der Werf W. The optimal amount and allocation of sampling effort for plant health inspection. Eur. Rev. Agric. Eco. 2009, 36:295-320.
38. Vose Risk Analysis: a Quantitative Guide 2001, Wiley & Sons, UK. second ed.
39. Wittwer G., McKirdy S., Wilson R. Regional economic impacts of a plant disease incursion using a general equilibrium approach. Aust. J. Agric. Res. Eco. 2005, 49:75-89.
40. Wittwer G., McKirdy S., Wilson R. Analyzing a Hypothetical Pierce's Disease Outbreak in South Australia Using a Dynamic CGE Approch 2006, Working Papers G-162, Monash University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
41. WTO Accessed 27.05. 2009. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm.