Assessing the economic impact of invasive species: The case of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) in the rangelands of Idaho, USA

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 876-882

  Juliá, Roxana ^a   Holland, David W ^b   Guenthner, Joseph ^c  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic impact; Idaho rangelands; Invasive species; Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.)

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COST ESTIMATING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

BIOECONOMIC; ECONOMIC COSTS; ECONOMIC IMPACTS; ECONOMIC MODELS; IDAHO RANGELAND; INPUT-OUTPUT; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVASIVE WEED; YELLOW STARTHISTLE (CENTAUREA SOLSITIALIS L);

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INVASIVE SPECIES; RANGELAND; WEED;

AGROECOSYSTEM; ARTICLE; CENTAUREA; CENTAUREA SOLSITIALIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; NONHUMAN; RANGELAND; SPECIES INVASION; UNITED STATES; WEED CONTROL;

IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CENTAUREA; CENTAUREA SOLSTITIALIS;

EID: 35348872005     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baltezore, J.F., Leitch, J.A., 1992. Characteristics, expenditures, and economics impact of resident and nonresident hunter and angler expenditures in North Dakota in 1990-91 season. Agricultural Economics Staff Paper no. AE92003. North Dakota State University, Fargo.
2. Bangsund, D.A., Baltezore, J.F., Leitch, J.A., Leistritz, F., 1993. Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on Wildland in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Agricultural Economics Report no. 304. North Dakota State University, Fargo.
3. Callihan, R.H., Lass, L.W., 1996. Yellow starthistle Management with Herbicides. Current Information Series no. 1036. University of Idaho, Moscow.
4. Callihan, R.H., Lass, L.W., McCaffrey, J., Michalson, E., 1996. Yellow starthistle management for small acreages. Current Information Series no. 1025. University of Idaho, Moscow.
5. Carlson, J.E., Willis, D.B., Michalson, E.L., Callihan, R.H., 1989. Yellow starthistle in North-Central Idaho: a survey of farmers' and ranchers' behavior and attitudes. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin no. 712. University of Idaho, Moscow.
6. Hartmans, M.A., Hongpei Zhang, Michalson, E.L., 1997. The costs of yellow starthistle management. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin no. 793. University of Idaho, Moscow.
7. Hirsch, S.A., Leitch, J.A., 1996. The impact of knapweed on Montana's economy. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin no. 355, Department of Agricultural Economics. North Dakota State University, Fargo.
8. Leitch, J.A., 1978. A model to estimate the changes in sportsmen expenditures due to land use of changes in a five county area of North Dakota. Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 78003. North Dakota State University, Fargo.
9. Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W.M., Evans H., Clout M., and Bazzaz F.A. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 689-710
10. In: Mc Neely J.A., Mooney H.A., Neille L.E., Schei P., and Waage J.K. (Eds). Global strategy on invasive alien species (2001), IUCN on behalf of the Global Invasive Species Programme, Gland, Switzerland
11. Miller R., and Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (1985), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
12. National Survey of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Department of the Interior and Bureau of the Census (1991), Department of Commerce, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC
13. National Invasive Species Council. Meeting the invasive species challenge: national invasive species management plan (2001), National Invasive Species Council, Washington DC
14. Perrings C., Williamson M., Barbier E.B., Delfino D., Dalmazzone S., Shogren J., Simmons P., and Watkinson A. Biological invasions risks and the public good: an economic perspective. Conservation Ecology 6 1 (2002) 1
15. Ribaudo, M.O., 1989. Water quality benefits from the conservation reserve program. Agricultural Economics Report no. 606, Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
16. Ribaudo, M.O., 1986. Reducing soil erosion: off-site benefits. Agricultural Economics Report no. 561, Natural Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
17. Sala, O.E. (and 18 others), 2000. Biodiersity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1779-1774.
18. Shaver J.C. North Dakota Rangeland Resources 1977 (1977), Society for Range Management and the Old West Regional Range Program, Denver
19. Smathers R.L., Church J.A., Gray C.W., and Rimbey N.R. Cow-calf budget 250 cow: summer on private range, winter feeding necessary (1999), University of Idaho, Moscow
20. Wallace, N., 1991. Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on North Dakota Wildland. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo.