Temporal and spatial patterns of retinal ganglion cells in response to natural stimuli

Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 389-396

  Zhang, Ying Ying ^a   Jin, Xin ^a   Gong, Hai Qing ^a   Liang, Pei Ji ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Coincident bursts; Kurtosis; Lifetime sparseness; Population sparseness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954810705     PISSN: 10003282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2009.00617     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rust N C, Movshon J A. In praise of artifice. Nat Neurosci, 2005, 8(12): 1647-1650
2. Reinagel P. How do visual neurons respond in the real world?. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2001,11(4): 437-442
3. Dong D W, Atick J J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network: Comput Neural Syst, 1995,6:345-358
4. Field D J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A, 1987, 4(12):2379-2394
5. Olshausen B A, Field D J. Vision and the coding of natural images. American Scientist, 2000, 88: 238-245
6. Lesica N A, Jin J, Weng C, et al. Adaptation to stimulus contrast and correlations during natural visual stimulation. Neuron, 2007,55 (3): 479-491
7. Vinje W E, Gallant J L. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science, 2000, 287 (5456): 1273-1276
8. Weliky M, Fiser J, Hunt R H, et al. Coding of natural scenes in primary visual cortex. Neuron, 2003,37(4): 703-718
9. Field D J. What is the goal of sensory coding?. Neural Computation, 1994,6: 559-601
10. Willmore B, Tolhurst D J. Characterizing the sparseness of neural odes. Network, 2001,12(3): 255-270
11. Liu X, Zhou Y, Gong H Q, et al. Contribution of the GABAergic pathway (s) to the correlated activities of chicken retinal ganglion cells. Brain Res, 2007,1177: 37-46
12. Chen A H, Zhou Y, Gong H Q, et al. Luminance adaptation increased the contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells. Neuro Report, 2005,16(4): 371-375
13. Zhang P M, Wu J Y, Zhou Y, et al. Spike sorting based on automatic template reconstruction with a partial solution to the overlapping problem. J Neurosci Methods, 2004,135(1-2): 55-65
14. Wang G L, Zhou Y, Chen A H, et al. A robust method for spike sorting with automatic overlap decomposition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2006,5(6): 1195-1198
15. Lesica N A, Stanley G B. Encoding of natural scene movies by tonic and burst spikes in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci, 2004,24(47): 10731-10740
16. van Hateren J H, van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc Biol Sci, 1998,265(1394): 359-366
17. Usrey W M, Alonso J M, Reid R C. Synaptic interactions between thalamic inputs to simple cells in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci, 2000,20(14): 5461-5467
18. Meister M, Berry M J. The neural code of the retina. Neuron, 1999,22(3): 435-450
19. Olshausen B A, Field D J. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2004,14(4): 481-487
20. Briggs F, Usrey W M. A fast, reciprocal pathway between the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci, 2007, 27(20): 5431-5436
21. Usrey W M, Reppas J B, Reid R C. Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus. Nature, 1998, 395(6700): 384-387
22. Sincich L C, Adams D L, Economides J R, et al. Transmission of spike trains at the retinogeniculate synapse. J Neurosci, 2007,27(10): 2683-2692