Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 37-45

  Qvist, Vibeke ^a   Laurberg, Lone ^b   Poulsen, Agneta ^b   Teglers, Poul Thorpen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cariostatic effects; Clinical trials; Dental amalgam; Dental restorations; Glass ionomer cements; Long term behaviour; Pedodontics

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; GLASS;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTISTRY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERIALS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH EXFOLIATION; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 1642379316     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350310008689     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Statement of Mercury. Use-contamination-proposals for solution. Copenhagen: Notex-Grafisk Service Center; 1987.
2. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:297-303.
3. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48: 305-11.
4. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent 1993;21:67-73.
5. Chadwick BL, Dummer PMH, Dunstan F, Gilmour ASM, Jones RJ, Phillips CJ, et al. The longevity of dental restorations. A systematic review. York: York Publishing Services Ltd; 2001.
6. Qvist V. Longevity of restorations in primary teeth. In: Hugoson A, Falk M, Johansson S, editors: Consensus conference on caries in the primary dentition and its clinical management. Stockholm: Förlagshuset Gothia; 2002. p. 69-83.
7. Krämer N. Moderne Füllungstherapie im Milch- und Wechselgebiß. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997;52:89-99.
8. Forss H, Widström E. Factors influencing the selection of restorative materials in dental care in Finland. J Dent 1996;24: 257-62.
9. Norwegian Board of Health. The Use of Dental filling Materials in Norway. IK 2675. Oslo: Norwegian Board of Health; 1999.
10. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-96.
11. National Board of Health Sundhedsstyrelsen, Denmark (1992; 1993; 1994; 1995; 1996). Copenhagen: National Statistics Child Oral Health Care; 1991; 1992; 1993; 1994; 1995.
12. American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for resin-based composites for posterior restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association, Council on Scientific Affairs; 2001.
13. Vigild M, Skak-Iversen L, Friis-Hasché E. Danish Child Oral Health Care Service: Legislation, Registration System, and Organization. In: Friis-Hasché E, editor: Child Oral Health Care in Denmark. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Press; 1994. p. 17-20.
14. Collett D. Modelling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
15. Mjör IA. Long-term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:60-5.
16. Hickel R, Voss A. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars. J Dent Child 1990;57: 184-8.
17. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991;170:177-81.
18. Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial. Br Dent J 1995;179:175-9.
19. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tornes KH, Alvheim H. Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth. J Dent 1999;27: 437-42.
20. Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000;189:93-7.
21. Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:2-8.
22. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:25-8.
23. Mjör IA, Jokstad A. Five-year study of class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkeonate (ionomer) cermet and resin-based composite materials. J Dent 1993;21:338-43.
24. Poulsen S. Caries in the primary dentition as a health problem: epidemiology and ethics. In: Hugoson A, Falk M, Johansson S, editors. Consensus conference on caries in the primary dentition and its clinical management. Stockholm: Förlagshuset Gothia; 2002. p. 11-22.
25. WHO 1997. Dental amalgam and alternative direct restorative materials. In: Mjör IA, Pakhomov GN editors. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
26. MFR 1992. Potential biological consequences of mercury released from dental amalgam. Proceedings from a conference. Stockholm: Swedish Medical Research Council; 1992.
27. NHI 1991. Effect and side-effects of dental restorative materials. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:1-144.
28. Qvist V, Johannessen L, Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. J Dent Res 1992;71:1370-3.
29. , Mejàre I, Stenlund H, Julihn A, Larsson I, Permert L. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the first permanent molar's mesial surface in Swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age. Caries Res 2001;35:178-85.
30. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000;50:361-6.
31. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF, Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: two-year results. Pediatr Dent 1985;7:96-103.
32. Oldenburg TR, Vann WF, Dilley DC. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children. Dent Mater 1987;3: 182-6.
33. Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllöf G, Modeér T. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater 1991;7:230-3.
34. Wong FSL, Day SJ. An investigation of factors influencing the longevity of restorations in primary molars. J Int Ass Dent Child 1990;20:11-6.
35. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS. Three-year follow up assessment of class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001;14:148-52.
36. Özer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:394-402.
37. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628-37.
38. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000;31:165-79.
39. Mejàre I, Källestål C, Stenlund H. Incidence and progression of approximal caries from 11 to 22 years of age in Sweden: a prospective radiographic study. Caries Res 1999;33:93-100.
40. Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Clinical variables affecting the marginal degradation of amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48:379-87.
41. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, Espelid I, Wikstrand K, Eide GE. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:384-9.
42. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, Dijken JWV, van. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:255-60.
43. Letzel H, Van 't Hof MA, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials. J Dent Res 1997;76:1787-98.
44. Folkesson UH, Andersson-Wenckert IE, Dijken JWV, van.. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. Swed Dent J 1999;23:1-9.