The influence of complete coronary revascularization on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary heart disease undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal of International Medical Research

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1106-1112

  Yang, H H ^a   Chen, Y ^a   Gao, C Y ^a  

^a HENAN PROVINCIAL PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Complete revascularization; Incomplete revascularization; Long term outcome; Multivessel coronary heart disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; BARE METAL STENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVESSEL CORONARY HEART DISEASE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENT DISEASE; SMOKING HABIT; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; CORONARY DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954786863     PISSN: 03000605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147323001003800339     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. The SOS Investigators: Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 965-970.
2. Takaishi A, Iwasaki K, Murakami T, et al: Coronary flow reserve after coronary intervention is similar in patients with preserved viability in previous myocardial infarction and in those with angina pectoris. J Int Med Res 2004; 32: 245-257.
3. Vander Salm TJ, Kip KE, Jones RH, et al: What constitutes optimal surgical revascularization? Answers from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 565-572.
4. Park HK, Ahn HS, Yoon SJ, et al: Comparing risk-adjusted hospital mortality for CABG and AMI patients. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 425-433.
5. Boga M, Discigil G, Ozkisacik EA, et al: Use of tissue Doppler imaging following coronary artery bypass surgery. J Int Med Res 2007; 35: 101-106.
6. Srinivas VS, Selzer F, Wilensky RL, et al: Completeness of revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease and its effect on one-year outcome: a report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry. J Interv Cardiol 2007; 20: 373-380.
7. Karaca I, Aydin K, Yavuzkir M, et al: Predictive value of C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing coronary artery stent implantation. J Int Med Res 2005; 33: 389-396.
8. Rossi ML, Belli G, Parenti DZ, et al: Do least harm philosophy may suffice for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19: 313-318.
9. Palmer ND, Causer JP, Ramsdale DR, et al: Effect of completeness of revascularization on clinical outcome in patients with multivessel disease presenting with unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 185-188.
10. McLellan CS, Ghali WA, Labinaz M, et al: Association between completeness of percutaneous coronary revascularization and postprocedure outcomes. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 800-806.
11. Ijsselmuiden AJ, Ezechiels J, Westendorp IC, et al: Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 467-474.
12. Applegate RJ, Graham SH, Gandhi SK, et al: Culprit vessel PCI versus traditional cath and PCI for STEMI. J Invasive Cardiol 2008; 20: 224-228.
13. Shishehbor MH, Bhatt DL: Treating patients with non-STEMI: stent the culprit artery only or address all lesions? Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2008; 10: 93-97.
14. Nikolsky E, Gruberg L, Patil CV, et al: Percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetic patients: is complete revascularization important. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 102-106.
15. van der Hoeven BL, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE: Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement versus bypass operation in symptomatic multiple-vessel disease: lessons from an observational study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 2837-2840 [in Dutch].
16. Qarawani D, Nahir M, Abboud M, et al: Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI. Int J Cardiol 2008; 123: 288-292.