Culprit vessel PCI versus traditional cath and PCI for STEMI

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 224-228

  Applegate, Robert J ^a   Graham, Stacy H ^a   Gandhi, Sanjay K ^a   Kutcher, Michael A ^a   Sacrinty, Matthew T ^a   Santos, Renato M ^a   Little, William C ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Mortality; STEMI; Stents

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVASCULARIZATION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PILOT PROJECTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43149126329     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gibson CM. Time is myocardium and time is outcomes. Circulation 2001;104:2632-2634.
2. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT, et al. Relationship of symptom-onset-toballoon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000;283:2941-2947.
3. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004;109:1223-1225.
4. Boersma E. The Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs. Thrombolysis (PCAT)-2 Trialists' Collaborative Group. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 2006;27:779-788.
5. Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M, et al. Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The guidelines applied in practice (GAP) initiative. JAMA 2002;287:1269-1276.
6. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2308-2320.
7. Singh KP, Harrington RA. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Med Clin North Am 2007;91:639-655.
8. Nallamothu BK, Blaney ME, Morris SM, et al. Acute reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction from 1994-2003. Am J Med 2007;120:693-699.
9. Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet 2002;359:373-377.
10. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the U.S. from 1990 through 1999: The national registry of myocardial infarction 1, 2, and 3. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2056-2063.
11. Kurz MC, Babcock C, Sinha S, et al. The impact of emergency physician-initiated primary percutaneous coronary intervention on mean door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:527-534.
12. Kraft PL, Newman S, Hanson D, et al. Emergency physician discretion to activate the cardiac catheterization team decreases door-to-balloon time for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:520-526.
13. Burzotta F, Testa L, Giannico F, et al. Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Internatl J Card 2008;123:313-321.
14. Boden WE, Eagle K, Granger CB. Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A comprehensive review of contemporary management options. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:917-929.
15. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:733-742.
16. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, et al. Comparison of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents on later frequency of acute myocardial infarction and death. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:333-338.
17. American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry Module Version 3.0. 2004. Available at: http://www.accncdr.com/webNCDR/ NCDRDocuments/datadictdefsonlyv30.pdf. American College of Cardiology 2006 June 1.
18. Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, et al. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1020-1029.
19. Nallamothu B, Fox KAA, Kennelly BM, et al. Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart published online 2007 June 25.
20. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs. immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial - PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2002;24:94-104.
21. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: Changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2004-2009.
22. Seshadri N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, et al. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation 2002;106:2346-2350.
23. Friedrich GJ, Bonatti J. Hybrid coronary artery revascularization - Review and update 2007. The Heart Surgery Forum 2007;10:E292-E296.