Telephone-administered intelligence testing for research in work and organizational psychology: A comparative assessment study

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 154-161

  Blickle, Gerhard ^a   Kramer, Jochen ^a   Mierke, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fact to face assesment; Intelligence testing; Research in work and organizational psychology; Telephone based assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954781018     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000022     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amelang, M., & Steinmayr, R. (2006). Is there a validity increment for tests of emotional intelligence in explaining the variance of performance criteria? Intelligence, 34, 459-468. (Pubitemid 44275954)
2. Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducle, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R: I-S-T 2000 R, Manual (2. Aufl.) [Intelligence Structure Test 2000]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
3. Barak, A., & English, N. (2002). Prospects and limitations of psychological testing on the Internet. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 19, 65-89.
4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
6. Borsboom, D., Mellenberg, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071.
7. Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London, UK: Sage.
8. Conte, J. M. (2005). A review and critique of emotional intelligence measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 433-440.
9. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
10. Diel, J. M., & Arbinger, R. (2001). Einführung in die Inferenzstatistik [Introduction to inferential statistics]. Frankfurt a. M.: Klotz.
11. Drasgow, F. (2003). Intelligence and the workplace. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 107-130). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
12. Hartmann, M. (2002). Der Mythos der Leistungseliten [The myth of the achievement elites. Top careers and social background in economy, politics, justice administration, and science]. Frankfurt: Campus.
13. Isserstedt, W., Middendorff, E., Fabian, G., Schnitzer, K., & Wolter, A. (2007). Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2006: 18. Sozialerhebung des Deutschen Studentenwerks durchgeführt durch HIS Hochschul-Informations-System [The economic and social situation of students in the Federal Republic of Germany 2006: 18th social survey of the German Students Association conducted by HIS Hochschul-Informations-System]. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
14. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: SSI.
15. Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership. A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542-552.
16. Kent, J., & Plomin, R. (1987). Testing specific cognitive abilities by telephone and mail. Intelligence, 11, 391-400.
17. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., & Jäger, T. (2007). Development and Validation of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) for the assessment of cognitive function across adulthood. The Journal of Psychology, 141, 147-170.
18. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.
19. Legree, P.J., Fischl, M.A., Gade, P.A., & Wilson, M. (1988). Testing word knowledge by telephone to estimate general cognitive aptitude using an adaptive test. Intelligence, 26, 91-98.
20. Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A. general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647-660.
21. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement. London, UK: Sage.
22. Muchinsky, O. M. (2003). Psychology applied to work (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23. Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M. M., Handler, L., Printern, A., Margolis, A. et al. (2004). Psychological testing on the internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59, 150-162.
24. Nesselroade, J. R., Pedersen, N. L., McClearn, G. E., Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1988). Factorial and criterion validities of telephone-assessed cognitive ability measures: Age and gender comparisons in adult twins. Research on Aging, 10, 220-234.
25. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K.L., & Feldman, D.C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
26. Salgado, J. F., & Anderson, N. (2002). Cognitive and GMA testing in the European. Community: Issues and evidence. Human Performance, 15, 75-96.
27. Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162-173.
28. Schmidt-Atzert, L., & Buhner, M. (2002, September). Entwicklung eines Leistungstests zur Emotionalen Intelligenz [Development of an. achievement test of Emotional Intelligence ]. Vortrag 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.
29. Spector, P. E. (2001). Research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: Data collection and data analysis with special consideration to international issues. In N. Anderson, D. Z. Ones, H. K. Singangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology, Vol. 1: Personnel psychology (pp. 10-26). London: Sage.
30. Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). London: Sage.
31. Thomas, J. C. (Ed.). (2004). Industrial and organizational assessment, Vol. 4: Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
32. Tippins, N.T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W.M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D.O. et al. (2006). Unproctored internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189-225.
33. Wittmann, A. J. (2002). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test (I-S-T 2000) [Intelligence Structure Test]. In U. P. Kanning & H. Holling (Eds.), Handbuch diagnostischer Instrumente (pp. 155-163). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
34. Wonderlic Inc. (1996). Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT-German Version, Forms A and B). Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic.
35. Wonderlic Inc. (2002). Wonderlic Personnel Test & Scholastic Level Exam: User's manual. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic.