Juvenile arrest rates for burglary: A routine activities approach

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 572-579

  Pollock, Wendi ^a   Joo, Hee Jong ^a   Lawton, Brian ^b  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954757374     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bonta James, Law Moira, Hanson Karl The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 123:123-142.
2. Bratt C. Fights among adolescents from the ethnic majority and from immigrant groups: The impact of alcohol consumption and participation in youth-based out-of-home activities. Acta Sociologica 2004, 47(1):7-29.
3. Cohen L., Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 1979, 44(4):588-608.
4. Cohn E., Rotton J. Even criminals take a holiday: Instrumental and expressive crimes on major and minor holidays. Journal of Criminal Justice 2003, 31:351-360.
5. Coupe T., Blake L. Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology 2006, 44(2):431-464.
6. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1995-2006). Uniform Crime Reports: Crime and Arrest Rate Comparison. Retrieved October 13, 2007, from: http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm.
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2007a). Uniform Crime Reports Burglary Data Source: National. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from: http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_38.html.
8. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2007b). Uniform Crime Reports Burglary Data Source: Texas. Retrieved on October 20, 2007, from: http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_69.html.
9. Francis B., Soothill K., Piquero A. Estimation issues and generational changes in modeling criminal career length. Crime & Delinquency 2007, 53(1):84-105.
10. Fuller J. Criminal Justice: Mainstream and Crosscurrents 2006, Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11. Gendreau Paul, Little Tracy, Goggin Claire A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology 1996, 34(4):575-607.
12. Griffin P. Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults: An analysis of state transfer and blended sentencing laws 2003, National Center for Juvenile Justice, Pittsburg, PA.
13. Hanson R.Karl, Bussiere Monique T. Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998, 66:348-362.
14. LaGrange T. The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1999, 36(4):393-422.
15. Larsson D. Exposure to property crime as a consequence of poverty. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 2006, 7(1):45-60.
16. Luke D. Multilevel Modeling 2004, (Sage University Paper Series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-143), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Mannon J. Domestic and intimate violence: An application of routine activities theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior 1997, 2(1):9-24.
18. Massey J., Krohn M., Bonati L. Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1989, 26(4):378-400.
19. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis 2002, (Sage University Paper Series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-106), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. Moriarty L., Williams J. Examining the relationship between routine activities theory and social disorganization: An analysis of property crime victimization. American Journal of Criminal Justice 1996, 21(1):43-59.
21. Osgood D., Anderson A. Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology 2004, 43(3):519-549.
22. Raudenbush S., Bryk A., Cheong Y., Congdon R., du Toit M. HLM6: Hierarchical linear & nonlinear modeling 2004, Scientific Software International Inc., Lincolnwood, IL.
23. Rotton J., Cohn E. Global warming and U.S. crime rates: An application of routine activities theory. Environment and Behavior 2003, 35(6):802-825.
24. Sampson R., Wooldredge J. Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal or Quantitative Criminology 1987, 3(4):371-393.
25. Sasse S. "Motivation" and routine activities theory. Deviant Behavior 2005, 26:547-570.
26. Sayrs L.W. Pooled time series analysis 1989, (Sage University Paper Series on quantitative applications in social sciences, 07-070), Sage Publications, Newburry Park, CA.
27. Schwartz M., Pitts V. Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly 1995, 12(1):9-31.
28. Sherley A. Contextualizing the sexual assault event: Images from police files. Deviant Behavior 2005, 26(2):87-108.
29. Spano R., Nagy S. Social guardianship and social isolation: An application and extension of lifestyle/routine activities theory to rural adolescents. Rural Sociology 2005, 70(3):414-437.
30. Tewksbury R., Mustaine E. Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies 2006, 19(1):61-75.
31. U. S. Census Bureau. (2006). United States Fact Sheet. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFFacts?_event=&geo_id=01000US&_geoContext=01000US&_street=&_county=&_cityTown=&_state=&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&ActiveGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=010&_submenuId=factsheet_1&ds_name=null&_ci_nbr=null&qr_name=null®=null%3Anull&_keyword=&_industry=.
32. Walker J., Golden J., VanHouten A. The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activities approach. Justice Research and Policy 2001, 3(2):15-33.