Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 227-249

  de la Torre, Jimmy ^a   Hong, Yuan ^a   Deng, Weiling ^b  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954736976     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00110.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. de la Torre J. The generalized DINA model 2008, July, Paper presented at the, International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Durham, NH
2. de la Torre J. A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively-based multiple-choice options. Applied Psychological Measurement 2009a, 33:163-183.
3. de la Torre J. DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 2009b, 34:115-130.
4. de la Torre J, Douglas J. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika 2004, 69:333-353.
5. de la Torre J, Douglas J. Model evaluation and selection in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika 2008, 73:595-624.
6. de la Torre J, Liu Y. A cognitive diagnosis model for continuous response 2008, March, Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY
7. Doignon J P, Falmagne J C. Knowledge spaces 1999, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag
8. Doornik J A. Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox (Version 3.1) 2003, Computer software, London, England, Timberlake Consultants Press
9. Embretson S E. A general multicomponent latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika 1984, 49:175-186.
10. Haertel E H. Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement 1989, 26:333-352.
11. Hartz S M. A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality 2002, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign
12. Henson R, Douglas J. Test construction for cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement 2005, 29:262-277.
13. Junker B W, Sijtsma K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 2001, 25:258-272.
14. Kuhn D. Why development does (and does not) occur: Evidence from the domain of inductive reasoning. Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives 2001, 221-249. McClelland J LSiegler R. In, Eds., pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
15. Leighton J P, Gierl M J, Hunka S. The attribute hierarchy model: An approach for integrating cognitive theory with assessment practice. Journal of Educational Measurement 2004, 41:205-236.
16. Macready G B, Dayton C M. The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Educational Statistics 1977, 2:99-120.
17. Maris E. Psychometric latent response models. Psychometrika 1995, 60:523-547.
18. Maris E. Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika 1999, 64:187-212.
19. Pellegrino J W, Baxter G P, Glaser R. Addressing the " two disciplines" problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practices. Review of research in education 1999, 307-353. Iran-Nejad A, Pearson P D, In, Eds., pp, Washington, DC, American Educational Research Association
20. Rupp A, Templin J. The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2008, 68:78-96.
21. Tatsuoka K K. Rule-space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 1983, 20:345-354.
22. Tatsuoka K K. Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis. Cognitively diagnostic assessment 1995, 327-359. Nichols P DChipman S FBrennan R L. In, Eds., pp, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
23. Templin J, Henson R, Rupp A, Jang E. Cognitive diagnosis models for nominal response data 2008, Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY