Test construction for cognitive diagnosis

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 262-277

  Henson, Robert ^a,b   Douglas, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive diagnosis; Cognitive diagnostic index; Kullback Leibler information; Test construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144479063     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621604272623     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chang, H., & Ying, Z. (1996). A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 213-229.
2. de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. (in press). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika.
3. DiBello, L. V., Stout, W. F., & Roussos, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnostic assessment liklihood-based classification techniques. In P. D. Nichols, D. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 361-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Hambleton, R., & Swamiinathan, H. (2000). Item response theory. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.
6. Haertel, E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 333-352.
7. Hartz, S. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
8. Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 55-73.
9. Lehmann, E., & Casella, G. (1998). Theory of point estimation: Second Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
10. Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Lord, F., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores with contributions from Alan Birnbaum. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Macready, G. B., & Dayton, C. M. (1977). The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Education Statistics, 33, 379-416.
13. Madigan, D., & Almond, R. (1995). Test selection strategies for belief networks. In D. Fisher & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Learning from data: AI and statistics IV (pp. 89-98). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187-212.
15. MathWorks. (2002). Getting started with Matlab. Natrick, MA: Author.
16. McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Rao, C. R. (1962). Efficient estimates and optimum inference procedures in large samples. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society Series B, 24, 46-72.
18. Tatsuoka, C. (2002). Data-analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), 51, 337-350.
19. Tatsouka, C., & Ferguson, T. (2003). Sequential classification on partially ordered sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65(1), 143-158.
20. Tatsuoka, K. (1985). A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconceptions in the pattern classification approach. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 55-73.
21. van der Linden, W. (1998). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.
22. Veldkamp, B. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2002). Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content. Psychometrika, 67(4), 575-588.
23. Yamamoto, K. (1987). A model that combines IRT and latent class models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.