Visual explanations

NPAR Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 173-178

  DeCarlo, Doug ^a   Stone, Matthew ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

depiction; non photorealism; perception

Indexed keywords

FORMAL REPRESENTATIONS; MUTUAL BENEFIT; PHOTOREALISM; TWO-DIMENSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL WORLD;

ANIMATION; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 77954728838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1809939.1809960     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. ADELSON, E. H. 2000. Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In The New Cognitive Neurosciences, second edition, M. S. Gazzaniga, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 339-351.
2. AGRAWALA, M., AND STOLTE, C. 2001. Rendering effective route maps: improving usability through generalization. In SIGGRAPH 2001, 241-249.
3. ANDERSON, B. L., AND WINAWER, J. 2008. Layered image representations and the computation of surface lightness. J. Vis. 8, 7 (7), 1-22.
4. ANDREWS, B. 2006. Introduction to perceptual principles in medical illustration. In Illustrative Visualization for Medicine and Science (Eurographics 2006 Tutorial notes), I. Viola, M. C. Sousa, D. Ebert, B. Andrews, B. Gooch, and C. Tietjen, Eds.
5. BARROW, H. G., AND TENENBAUM, J. M. 1978. Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from images. In Computer Vision Systems, A. Hanson and E. Riseman, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 3-26.
6. BIEDERMAN, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115-147.
7. BINFORD, T. O. 1981. Inferring surfaces from images. Artificial Intelligence 17, 205-244.
8. DALY, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision, A. B. Watson, Ed. MIT Press, 179-206.
9. DURAND, F. 2002. An invitation to discuss computer depiction. In International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Rendering and Animation (NPAR) 2002, 111-124.
10. FELDMAN, J. 2009. Bayes and the simplicity principle in perception. Psychological Review 116, 4, 875-887.
11. FREEMAN, W. T. 1994. The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature 76, 181-189.
12. HELMHOLTZ, H. 1962. Treatise on Physiological Optics, Volume 3. Dover (reprint of translation; original 1909), New York.
13. HOCHBERG, J. E., AND MCALISTER, E. 1953. A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". Journal of Experimental Psychology 46, 361-364.
14. HODGES, E. R. S. 2003. The Guild Handbook of Scientific Illustration, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
15. KANIZSA, G. 1979. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. Präger, New York.
16. KERSTEN, D., MAMASSIAN, P., AND YUILLE, A. 2004. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 271-304.
17. LEYTON, M. 1992. Symmetry, Causality, Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. LI, M., AND VITÁNYI, P. 2008. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, Third Edition. Springer, New York.
19. LI, W., RITTER, L., AGRAWALA, M., CURLESS, B., AND SALESIN, D. 2007. Interactive cutaway illustrations of complex 3D models. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3 (July), 31:1-31:11.
20. LOWE, D. G. 1985. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
21. MARR, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
22. MEIER, B. J. 1996. Painterly rendering for animation. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 96, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 477-484.
23. MI, X., DECARLO, D., AND STONE, M. 2009. Abstraction of 2D shapes in terms of parts. In International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Rendering and Animation (NPAR) 2009, 15-24.
24. MITCHELL, J. L., FRANCKE, M., AND ENG, D. 2007. Illustrative rendering in Team Fortress 2. In International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Rendering and Animation (NPAR) 2007, ACM, 19-32.
25. MITRA, N. J., GUIBAS, L. J., AND PAULY, M. 2006. Partial and approximate symmetry detection for 3D geometry. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3 (July), 560-568.
26. MITRA, N. J., GUIBAS, L. J., AND PAULY, M. 2007. Symmetrization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3 (July), 63:1-63:8.
27. PAULY, M., MITRA, N. J., WALLNER, J., POTTMANN, H., AND GUIBAS, L. 2008. Discovering structural regularity in 3D geometry. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3, #43, 1-11.
28. PODOLAK, J., SHILANE, P., GOLOVINSKIY, A., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND FUNKHOUSER, T. 2006. A planar-reflective symmetry transform for 3D shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3 (July), 549-559.
29. RAMANARAYANAN, G., FERWERDA, J., WALTER, B., AND BALA, K. 2007. Visual equivalence: Towards a new standard for image fidelity. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26, 3 (July), 76:1-76:11.
30. RUSKIN, J. 1857. The Elements of Drawing. Smith, Elder and Co.
31. SEARLE, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge.
32. SINGH, M., AND ANDERSON, B. L. 2002. Toward a perceptual theory of transparency. Psychological Review 109, 492-519.
33. SINGH, M., AND HOFFMAN, D. D. 2001. Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In From Fragments to Objects: Grouping and Segmentation in Vision, T. F. Shipley and P. J. Kellman, Eds. Elsevier Science Ltd., 401-459.
34. TAPPEN, M. F., FREEMAN, W. T., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2005. Recovering intrinsic images from a single image. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 9, 1459-1472.
35. VAN DER HELM, P. A. 2007. The resurrection of simplicity in vision. In In the Mind's Eye : Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Film, and the World, M. A. Peterson, B. Gillam, and H. Sedgwick, Eds. Oxford University Press, New York, 518-524.
36. WALTZ, D. L. 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, 19-92.
37. WEISS, Y., SIMONCELLI, E. P., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2002. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 5, 598-604.
38. WILLATS, J. 1997. Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures. Princeton University Press.