Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 986-991

  Bitsch, Rudi G ^a   Jäger, Sebastian ^a   Lürssen, Marcus ^a   Loidolt, Travis ^b   Schmalzried, Thomas P ^b   Clarius, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone density; Cementing technique; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Initial stability; Patient selection

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; FEMUR; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AGED; CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STANDARD;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE DENSITY; CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 77954716040     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21094     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. 2004. Metal-onmetal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:28-39.
2. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, et al. 2004. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Ortho 418:87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
3. Beaule PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, et al. 2004. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:2015-2021.
4. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, et al. 2005. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:200-204. (Pubitemid 44384221)
5. Ducheyne P, De MP, Aernoudt E. 1977. Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11:811-838. (Pubitemid 8234690)
6. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, et al. 1997. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79:707-714.
7. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. 1986. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108-113. (Pubitemid 16049779)
8. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, et al. 2007. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22:481-489.
9. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. 2008. Cementing the metaphyseal stem in metal-on-metal resurfacing: when and why. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:79-83.
10. Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, et al. 2008. Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development of a laboratory model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90(Suppl 3)102-110.
11. Bitsch RG, Schmalzried TP. 2008. [Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. What do we know?]. Orthopade 37:667-671.
12. Gortz W, Nagerl UV, Nagerl H, et al. 2002. Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads. J Biomech Eng 124:706-713. (Pubitemid 36119878)
13. Jakubowitz E, Bitsch RG, Heisel C, et al. 2008. Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. J Biomech 41:3078-3084.
14. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, et al. 2008. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90 (Suppl 3) 89-95.
15. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. 2006. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 88 (Suppl 1 Pt 2) 234-249.
16. Beaule PE, Campbell P, Shim P. 2007. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456:148-152. (Pubitemid 46662411)
17. Leunig M, Ganz R. 2007. Vascularity of the femoral head after Birmingham hip resurfacing. A technetium Tc 99m bone scan/single photon emission computed tomography study. J Arthroplasty 22:784-785.
18. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk OL, et al. 2008. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90 (Suppl 3) 96-101.
19. Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Silva M, et al. 2007. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 25: 423-431. (Pubitemid 46542028)
20. Campbell P, Beaule PE, Ebramzadeh E, et al. 2006. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:35-46. (Pubitemid 44900958)
21. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Ruther W, et al. 2006. Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220: 333-344.
22. Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel C, et al. 2004. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:40-46. (Pubitemid 38057334)
23. Ma SM, Kabo JM, Amstutz HC. 1983. Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:366-370. (Pubitemid 13112709)