The impact of social norm change strategies on smokers' quitting behaviours

Tobacco Control

Volumn 19, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Zhang, Xueying ^a   Cowling, David W ^a   Tang, Hao ^a  

^a California Tobacco Control Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MARKETING; METHODOLOGY; PASSIVE SMOKING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CULTURE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MARKETING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 77954713351     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.029447     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bal DG, Lloyd JC, Roeseler A, et al. California as a model. J Clin Oncol 2001;19 (Suppl 18):69S-73S. (Pubitemid 32880085)
2. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking? JAMA 1998;280:893-9. (Pubitemid 28423916)
3. Hu TW, Sung HY, Keeler TE. Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs. an anti-smoking media campaign. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1218-22.
4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-28, DHHS Publication No. SMA 05-4062). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2005.
5. Orzechowski W, Walker RC. The tax burden on tobacco: historical compilation. Vol 40. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski & Walker, 2005.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Declines in lung cancer rateseCalifornia, 1988-1997. MWWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000;49:1066-9.
7. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1772-7.
8. California Department of Public Health, Tobacco Control Program (2008). California Tobacco Control Update 2008.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs - August 1999. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 1999.
10. McLeroy KR, Bibean D, Steckler A, et al. An ecological perspective on health programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15:351-77.
11. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot 1996;10:282-98. (Pubitemid 26081505)
12. Brownson RC, Koffman DM, Novotny TE, et al. Environmental and policy interventions to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular disease. Health Educ Q 1995;22:478-98.
13. Marshall G. A dictionary of sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford Express, 1998. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O88-norm.html (accessed 3 Feb 2010).
14. California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section (1998). A model for change: the California experience in tobacco control.
15. Tang H, Cowling DW, Stevens CM, et al. Changes of attitudes and behaviors of bar owners and staff after a smoke-free bar law. Tob Control 2004;13:87-9. (Pubitemid 39456650)
16. California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section (1998). California Tobacco Control Update 1998.
17. Starr G, Rogers T, Schooley M, et al. Key outcome indicators for evaluating comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005.
18. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med 2002;35:511-18. (Pubitemid 35352221)
19. Arheart KL, Sly DF, Trapido EJ, et al. Assessing the reliability and validity of antitobacco attitudes/beliefs in the context of a campaign strategy. Prev Med 2004;39:909-18. (Pubitemid 39314458)
20. Evans WD, Price S, Blahut S. Evaluating the truth® brand. J Health Commun 2005;10:181-92.
21. California Adult Tobacco Survey 2007 Documentation and Technical Report. http://www.surveyresearchgroup.org/sub.php?page=projects-adult-tobacco (accessed Oct 2008).
22. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
23. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. SEM 1999;6:1-55.
24. SAS documentation. http://support.sas.com/91doc/getDoc/statug.hlp/factor- sect16. htm (accessed 21 Jul 2006).