Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted kagan scales

Aphasiology

Volumn 24, Issue 6-8, 2010, Pages 914-927

  Togher, Leanne ^a   Power, Emma ^a   Tate, Robyn ^a   McDonald, Skye ^b   Rietdijk, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Cognitivecommunication; Conversation; Rating scales; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; KAGAN SCALE; MALE; POSTTRAUMATIC AMNESIA; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPEECH THERAPY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954708134     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030903422478     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adamovich, B., & Henderson, J. (1992). Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury (SCATBI). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
2. Bellon, M. L., & Rees, R. J. (2006). The effect of context on communication: A study of the language and communication skills of adults with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(10), 1069-1078.
3. Bond, F., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11(5), 319-329.
4. Bruns, J. J., & Hauser, W. (2003). The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review. Epilepsia, 44(Supplement 10), 2-10.
5. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
6. Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech & Language, 26(4), 223-241.
7. Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech & Language, 28(2), 122-135.
8. Douglas, J. M., O'Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14(3), 251-268.
9. Hyder, A. A., Wunderlich, C. A., Puvanachandra, P., Gururaj, G., & Kobusingye, O. C. (2007). The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation, 22(5), 341-353.
10. Kagan, A., Black, S. E., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversational partners using "Supported Conversation with Adults with Aphasia" (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 624-638.
11. Kagan, A., Winckel, J., Black, S., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2004). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(1), 67-83.
12. Linscott, R. J., Knight, R. G., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1996). The Profile of Functional Impairment of Communication (PFIC): A measure of communication impairment for clinical use. Brain Injury, 10(6), 397-412.
13. Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105-119.
14. Shelton, C., & Shryock, M. (2007). Effectiveness of communication/interaction strategies with patients who have neurological injuries in a rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury, 21(12), 1259-1266.
15. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
16. Struchen, M. A., Clark, A. N., Sander, A. M., Mills, M. R., Evans, G., & Kurtz, D. (2008). Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(2), 185-198.
17. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1996). A new perspective in the relationship between communication impairment and disempowerment following head injury in information exchanges. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(11), 559-566.
18. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997a). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population:telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11(3), 169-189.
19. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997b). Measuring service encounters in the traumatic brain injury population. Aphasiology, 11(4/5), 491-504.
20. Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2009). Training communication partners of people with TBI: Reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment, 10(2), 188-204.
21. Turkstra, L. S., Brehm, S. E., & Montgomery, E. B. (2006). Analysing conversational discourse after traumatic brain injury: Isn't it about time? Brain Impairment, 7(3), 234-245.
22. Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101-110.
23. WHO. (2001). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
24. Ylvisaker, M., Feeney, T. J., & Urbanczyk, B. (1993). Developing a positive communication culture for rehabilitation: Communication training for staff and family members. In C. J. Durgin, N. D. Schmidt, & L. J. Fryer (Eds.), Staff development and clinical intervention in brain injury rehabilitation (pp. 57-81). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
25. Ylvisaker, M., Sellars, C., & Edelman, L. (1998). Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in preschoolers. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Children and adolescents (pp. 303-329). Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
26. Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L. S., & Coelho, C. (2005). Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Seminars in Speech & Language, 26, 256-267.