Remaking "nature": The ecological turn in Dutch water management

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 206-235

  Disco, Cornelis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036248610     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224390202700202     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Abbott, A. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Albert de la Bruheze, A. A. 1992. Political construction of technology: Nuclear waste disposal in the United States. Twente, the Netherlands: University of Twente Press.
3. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Toward a new modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Bijker, W. 1993. Dutch, dikes and democracy: An argument against democratic, flexible, good and bad technologies.Technology Assessment Texts 11. Lyngby, DK: Unit of Technology Assessment, The Technical University of Denmark.
5. _. 1995. Sociohistorical technology studies. In Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, 229-56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Bosch, T., and W. van der Ham. 1998. Twee Eeuwen Rijkswaterstaat: 1795-1998. Zaltbommel, the Netherlands: Europese Bibliotheek.
7. Bucher, R. 1962. Pathology: A study of social movements within a profession. Social Problems 10:40-51.
8. Bucher, R., and A. Strauss. 1961. Professions in process. American Journal of Sociology 66:325-34.
9. Carson, R. 1964. Silent spring. New York: Fawcett Crest.
10. Disco, C. 1990. Made in Delft: Professional engineering in the Netherlands 1880-1940. Unpublished diss., University of Amsterdam.
11. Disco, C., and B. van der Meulen, eds. 1998. Getting new technologies together: Studies in making sociotechnical order. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
12. Disco, C., A. Rip, and B. van der Meulen. 1992. Technical innovation and the universities: Divisions of labor in cosmopolitan technical regimes. Social Science Information 31 (3): 465-507.
13. Goeller, B. F., A. F. Abrahamse, and J. H. Bigelow. 1977. Protecting an estuary from floods: Policy analysis of the Oosterschelde. Vol. 1, Summary report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14. Hajer, M. A. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
15. Lash, S., B. Szerszinski, and B. Wynne, eds. 1996. Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Lintsen, H. 1980. Nederlandse Ingenieurs in de Negentiende Eeuw: Een Streven naar Erkenning en Macht. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
17. Meadows, D. L., and F. Franken. 1972. Rapport van de Club van Rome. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Uitgeverij Met Spectrum.
18. Pastoors, M. 1992. The Oosterschelde revisited: Evaluation of ecological modelling in the POLANO-project (policy analysis of the Oosterschelde) 1974-1977. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam, Department of Science Dynamics.
19. Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. Technological dramas. Science, Technology, & Human Values 17:282-312.
20. Rijkswaterstaat. 1989. Derde Nota Walerhuishouding.. The Hague, the Netherlands: Tweede Kamer Staten Generaal.
21. _. 1998. MER beheer Haringvlietsluizen: Over de grens van zout en zoet. The Hague, the Netherlands: Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Zuid Holland.
22. Saeijs, H.L.F. 1985. Omgaan met Water. The Hague, the Netherlands: Rijkswaterstaat.
23. _. 1995. Levend Water en een Wereldstad: Ecologie als Economische Factor in het Waterbeheer. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University.
24. Star, L. S., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science 19:387-420.
25. van de Poel, I. 1998. Changing technologies. Twente, the Netherlands: University of Twente Press.
26. van de Poel, I., and C. Disco. 1996. Influencing technology: Design worlds and their legitimacy. In The role of design in the shaping of technology, edited by J. Perrin and D. Vinck, 93-129. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
27. van der Ven, G., ed. 1993. Leefbaar Laagland: Geschiedenis van de waterbeheersing en landaanwinning in Nederland. Utrecht, NL: Matrijs Publishers.
28. van der Windt, H. J. 1995a. De amoebe als verbeelding der natuur. Hennis en Methode 3:251-76.
29. _. 1995b. En dan: Wat is Natuur nog in dit Land? Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Boom.
30. van Luin, A. B., and J. E. Hulshof. 1995. RIZA: 75 jaar deskundig in water. Lelystad, the Netherlands: Stichting IVIO.
31. van Veen, J. 1962. Dredge, drain, reclaim: The art of a nation. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
32. Westerheijden, D. F. 1988. Schuiven in de Oosterschelde: Besluitvorming rond de Oosterschelde 1973-1976. Twente, the Netherlands: Universiteit Twente, Faculteit Bestuurskunde.