Sensitivity analysis and optimal shape design for bone-prosthesis interfaces in a femoral head surface replacement

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 245-256

  Vena, P ^a   Verdonschot, N ^b   Contro, R ^a   Huiskes, R ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Finite element; Interface stress; Mathematical programming; Sensitivity analysis; Shape optimization

Indexed keywords

BONE REMODELLING; BONE-PROSTHESIS INTERFACE; COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURES; DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; FEMORAL HEADS; FINITE ELEMENT; INTERFACE STRESS; INTERFACE STRESS DISTRIBUTION; NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATIONS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL SHAPE DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES;

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; PROSTHETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING;

EID: 0141936509     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840008915268     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. McMinn, D., Treacy, R., Lin, K. and Pynsent, P. (1996). Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip, Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop, 329, Suppl: S89-S98.
2. Schmalzried, T. P., Fowble, V. A., Ure, K. J. and Amstutz, H. C. (1996). Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation, and early results. Clin Orthop 1996 Aug, 329, Suppl: SI06-S114.
3. Huiskes, R., Strens, P., Vroemen, W. and Slooff, J. (1990). Post-Loosening Mechanical Behavior of Femoral Resurfacing Prostheses. Clinincal Materials, 6, 37-55.
4. Huiskes, R. (1993). Failed Innovation in Total Hip Replacement Diagnosis and Proposal for a cure. Acta Orthop. Scand, 64, 699-716.
5. Huiskes, R. and Boeklagen, R. (1989). Mathematical Shape Optimization of Hip Prosthesis Design. Journal of Biomechanics, 22(8/9), 793-804.
6. Kuiper, J. H. and Huiskes, R. (1997). Mathematical optimization of elastic properties: application to cementless hip stem design. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 119, 166-174.
7. Zienkiewicz, O. C. and Campbell, J. S. (1973). Shape Optimization and Sequential Linear Programming. Optimum Structural Design, ED. Gallagher and Zienkiewitcz, New York.
8. Dems, K. and Mróz, Z. (1984). Variational Approach by means of Adjoint Systems to Structural Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis-II. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 20, 527-552.
9. Huiskes, R., Weinans, H., Grootenboer, H. J., Dalstra, M., Fudala, B. and Slooff, T. J. (1987). Adaptive bone-remodelling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 1135-1150.
10. Huiskes, R., Pascal, H. G., Strens, P., Van Heck, J. and Sloof, H. (1985). Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip. Acta Orthop Scand, 56, 474-478.
11. Vena, P. (1998). Shape optimization of a femoral head endoprosthesis allowing for interface behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis. Politecnico di Milano.
12. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R. and Grootenboer, H. J. (1993). Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces. Journal of Biomechanics, 26, 1271-1281.