How to practice evidence-based medicine

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 286-294

  Swanson, Jennifer A ^a,b   Schmitz, Delaine ^a,b   Chung, Kevin C ^a,b  

^a University of Michigan Health System ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954660097     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dc54ee     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Shah HM, Chung KC. Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:982-988.
2. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidencebased medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420-2425.
3. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2002.
4. Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2008;300:1814-1816.
5. Chung KC, Ram AN. Evidence-based medicine: The fourth revolution in American medicine? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123:389-398.
6. Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385-1389.
7. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence- Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
8. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71-72.
9. Claridge JA, Fabian TC. History and development of evidence- based medicine. World J Surg. 2005;29:547-553.
10. Doherty S. History of evidence-based medicine: Oranges, chloride of lime and leeches. Barriers to teaching old dogs new tricks. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17:314-321.
11. Tröhler U. Cheselden's 1740 presentation of data on agespecific mortality after lithotomy. Available at: http://www. jameslindlibrary.org/trial- records/17th-18th-Century/ cheselden/cheselden-commentary.html. Accessed October 28, 2009.
12. Evans I, Thornton H, Chalmers I. Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare. London: The British Library; 2006.
13. Gilbert R, Salanti G, Harden M, See S. Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: Systematic review of observational studies and historical review of recommendations from 1940 to 2002. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34: 874-887.
14. Aon Consulting. Health Care Reform Survey Report 2009. Available at: http://www.aon.com. Accessed November 13, 2009.
15. Fletcher AE. Controversy over "contradiction": Should randomized trials always trump observational studies? Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:384-386.
16. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing Levels of Evidence to The Journal. Available at: http:// www.ejbjs.org/journalclub/1-85-1-1.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2009.
17. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. Available at: http://www. cebm.net/index.aspx. Accessed April 30, 2007.
18. French J, Gronseth G. Lost in a jungle of evidence: We need a compass. Neurology 2008;71:1634-1638.
19. Schmidt AH, Zhao G, Turkelson C. Levels of evidence at the AAOS meeting: Can authors rate their own submissions, and do other raters agree? J Bone Joint Surg (Am.) 2009;91:867-873.
20. The CONSORT Group. The CONSORT Statement. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/. Accessed October 28, 2009.
21. The STROBE Group. STROBE Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. Available at: http://www.strobe- statement.org/index.html. Accessed October 28, 2009.
22. EQUATOR Network. Introduction to Reporting Guidelines. Available at: http://www.equator-network.org/index.aspx? o-1032. Accessed October 28, 2009.
23. Margaliot Z, Chung KC. Systematic reviews: A primer for plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120: 1834-1841.
24. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926.
25. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1448-1454.
26. Henley MB, Turkelson C, Jacobs JJ, Haralson RH. AOA symposium: Evidence-based medicine, the quality initiative, and P4P: Performance or paperwork? J Bone Joint Surg (Am.) 2008; 90:2781-2790.
27. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-1230.
28. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: A model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714.
29. Tröhler U. James Lind and scurvy: 1747 to 1795. Available at: http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/trial-records/17th-18th- Century/lind/lind-1753- commentary.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2009.
30. Silverman WA. Where's the Evidence? Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998:165.